×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Grillage vs Shell model

Grillage vs Shell model

Grillage vs Shell model

(OP)
Hi.
Please consider a typical I girder superstructure.
Common practice in the industry is to use a Grillage model for analysis and design.
In longitudinal direction, we model the effect of deck slab in the form of effective width of each girder (Girder modeled as beam element) to account for the effect of shear lag and transversely the long. members are connected by transverse members (beam elements).
What I am interested is to calculate the reactions due to Dead load of a curved span model.
If I model the girder alone (without the effective width) as a Beam element and model a shell element to simulate the Deck slab, is the effect of changing effective width along the girder inherently considered in the Shell? Are my reactions accurate?
(In order to accurately model the Inertia, I will consider my axis at top of the deck slab, model the shell element as Top line model, model the girder along this axis but eccentric to this axis such that the top of girder coincides with the bottom of deck slab. Supports assigned at the ends of axis. This is as per Sofistik model)
Please respond.
Thanks in advance.
Best.

RE: Grillage vs Shell model

Hi Dakka,

Your question is answered in Section 8.2.3 of the 2019 FHWA Manual for Refined Analysis in Bridge Design and Evaluation. I have attached the relevant section below in case you don't have a copy.

Essentially, to make your model account for "effective width", you have to refine your slab grid/mesh. When you do the "section cut" to integrate the stresses for equivalent beam forces (M and V), the "section cut" has to be approximately what the "effective width" is. To do that you will need a refined slab mesh.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close