×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

(OP)
Which is the better for valve seat surfacing, Electroless nickel plating and Hardfacing?

RE: ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

What valve type, size, pressure, temperature, application etc., are you wanting to discuss? Why is hardfacing required?

*** Per ISO-4126, the generic term 'Safety Valve' is used regardless of application or design ***

*** 'Pressure-relief Valve' is the equivalent ASME/API term ***

RE: ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

(OP)
Thank you for your response

GATE VALVE, CLASS 150#; BODY: ASTM B148 UNS C95800; TRIM: ASTM B148 UNS C95800; so from the trim of the valve would the valve seat be Hard Faced?

RE: ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

No. Seat would not be hardfaced.

RE: ENP vs HardFacing for valve seat

Hi,

I think many experts and valve practitioners here are trying to understand your question, whilst I got the impression that you only want to hear the answer and not really understand it.
So, no offense, but there is a gap of communication there.

Obturator asking for valve application meaning is this for water, for sour service application, slurry, abrasive application or else? what is the temperature and pressure?
Reason for the inquiry is what kind of corrosion/erosion mechanism due to the medium which is potential threat for valve trim. And whether hard facing are indeed required.

There are thousands pages of material study which discuss over hard facing (ENP, tungsten carbide included), of which we cannot summarize it in this forum. You have to do this research by yourself.
Hardness of material is a trade off with regards to its application.

General material such as carbon and low alloy steel alone have relatively low hardness, hence more susceptible for erosion and/or corrosion. Applying only carbon/low alloy on trim (wedge and/or seat) > eventually will be corroded/eroded>later stage than you will have excessive leak rate.
However the harder the material, it not necessarily good. Above 22 HRC material might be prone sulfide corrosion cracking and hydrogen stress cracking. Therefore NACE MR0175 suggest to have maximum hardness of 22 HRC.
I am not metallurgist expert, suggest to read ENP, Tungsten carbide and Stellite datasheet. Below link is old thread in this forum.
https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=255437....

It is a common practice to have Seat treated as sacrificial part due to it is relatively easier to be replaced/repaired than wedge/ball/plug. Hence for seat is either without hard facing or if indeed hardfaced then usually it has lower hardness in comparison with its wedge (for example if wedge with Stellite 21, then seat is with Stellite 6).
Both parts (seat and wedge) to be required for hardfacing is usually for confirmed abrasive (not just corrosive) medium.

In your case, from different posting, you mentioned this is for water. Thus not susceptible for abrasion or sour service corrosion.
Sour service hardness requirement is 22 HRC
Alumunium bronze (your valve) hardness is 27 HRC
ENP hardness 68-72 HRC, but what for since there is minimum to no risk associated with abrasion/corrosion
Stellite 6 hardness is 35-40 HRC. Again what for.

For water only (neutral or even brackish), Alumunium bronze alone is sufficient. No need for hardfacing.
PS: in 2010 I did repair valve for water treatment plant in Indonesia , valve was dated 1920 (Dutch made) with Alumunium Bronze wedge and Seat. No corrosion found, and only small wear due to 90 years in service. Solid material selection (and good workmanship when valve was made).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close