Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
(OP)
This question regards engine compression testers and the effect Schrader valve location has on accuracy of compression readings.
Background: typical automotive shop style compression testers consist of a pressure gauge attached to a flexible tube (typical ~16-inches long) with an adapter at its opposite end which threads into the spark plug hole. Higher quality gauge brands such as Snap-on or MAC have a Schrader valve located in the adapter end of the tube closest to the spark plug hole while other lower cost models have the valve located at the opposite end of the tube, adjacent to the gauge.
Does this difference of valve position make any difference in the accuracy of compression readings?
Some professional mechanics would argue that if the Schrader valve is located at the gauge, the entire volume of the 16-inch long adapter tube adds to the combustion chamber volume and would reduce the resulting compression readings (for the sake of this question let's say that simple compression ratio of an engine is based on the relationship, CR = (Vd + Vc)/Vc where Vd = displacement volume, the volume inside the cylinder displaced by the piston from the beginning of the compression stroke to the end of the stroke and Vc = clearance volume, the volume of the space in the cylinder left at the end of the compression stroke.) So any volume added by the flexible tube connected at the spark pug hole would accrue to the Vc term and somewhat diminish the overall CR and reduce gauge readings accordingly; this would be much more pronounced on small 2-stroke engines.
Consequently they (i.e., mechanics and techs) declare that when the Schrader valve is located at the spark plug end of the tube, no additional volume is added to the clearance volume and compression readings will be most accurate. This makes no sense to me. My contention is that when the engine is cranked over and pressure builds sufficiently to lift the Schrader valve, (at ~3-4psi) then the pressure pathway is open to the flexible tube and the tube volume then necessarily becomes part of the clearance volume just the same as mentioned above, so there should be NO difference in gauge readings regardless of where the Schrader valve is located.
Hoping for truth-tellers to offer expert opinions, technical dissertations and/or criticisms. All input gladly invited and thank you very much.
Background: typical automotive shop style compression testers consist of a pressure gauge attached to a flexible tube (typical ~16-inches long) with an adapter at its opposite end which threads into the spark plug hole. Higher quality gauge brands such as Snap-on or MAC have a Schrader valve located in the adapter end of the tube closest to the spark plug hole while other lower cost models have the valve located at the opposite end of the tube, adjacent to the gauge.
Does this difference of valve position make any difference in the accuracy of compression readings?
Some professional mechanics would argue that if the Schrader valve is located at the gauge, the entire volume of the 16-inch long adapter tube adds to the combustion chamber volume and would reduce the resulting compression readings (for the sake of this question let's say that simple compression ratio of an engine is based on the relationship, CR = (Vd + Vc)/Vc where Vd = displacement volume, the volume inside the cylinder displaced by the piston from the beginning of the compression stroke to the end of the stroke and Vc = clearance volume, the volume of the space in the cylinder left at the end of the compression stroke.) So any volume added by the flexible tube connected at the spark pug hole would accrue to the Vc term and somewhat diminish the overall CR and reduce gauge readings accordingly; this would be much more pronounced on small 2-stroke engines.
Consequently they (i.e., mechanics and techs) declare that when the Schrader valve is located at the spark plug end of the tube, no additional volume is added to the clearance volume and compression readings will be most accurate. This makes no sense to me. My contention is that when the engine is cranked over and pressure builds sufficiently to lift the Schrader valve, (at ~3-4psi) then the pressure pathway is open to the flexible tube and the tube volume then necessarily becomes part of the clearance volume just the same as mentioned above, so there should be NO difference in gauge readings regardless of where the Schrader valve is located.
Hoping for truth-tellers to offer expert opinions, technical dissertations and/or criticisms. All input gladly invited and thank you very much.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
I am a bit dubious that a Shrader valve is used. They are heavily spring energized which is why every tire filling fitting I've ever used includes a plunger to force the valve open to let air in.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
The Schrader valves used on compression tester have a much lower lift pressure than a tire valve, something on the order of ~4psi or less.
Thanks for your reply CompositePro -
I realize the gauge pressure reading will (ideally) be less than the actual pressure by an amount equal to the cracking pressure of the valve and yes these type of gauges are most useful for comparative basis'.
But you said, "... And the location will affect the reading... " and this is the very point of my inquiry here. I tried to make the case that location shouldn't matter. Can you explain why location of the Schrader valve will affect the reading ?
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Accuracy of the reading will be nimportant if the test result is to be compared to the limits publised for some engines.
je suis charlie
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
The test readings instantly became shockingly low.
A new genuine proper compression tester valve(package of 2 or 3 fromn NAPA) restored useful function.
I recall when tested by hand (finger) the comp tester valve spring was very weak.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
To make this obvious, imagine if the hose had a volume of one liter. What results would you expect?
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
In your extreme example of a one liter hose between the cylinder and valve, I can see that the valve may struggle to crack open especially when the cylinder volume is small. So, yeah I'm beginning to accept that in actual practice, valve location just might make a difference !!
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Does that context fix it for you?
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
It definitely does, and the explanation is easy.
It's true that whenever the schrader valve is open, the entire tube volume is being compressed.
What's missing in the thought process above is that the cylinder volume, and anything exposed to the cylinder volume, returns back to ambient pressure during each cycle. Anything on the other side of the schrader valve never returns back to ambient pressure.
Near the end of the test with the valve on the chamber end of the hose, you are cracking the valve against the little column of air inside the tube which is already at 150 (or whatever) psi. When that valve opens, the volume behind it doesn't create an artificial drop in compression ratio because it's already pressurized.
If the valve is at the gauge end, and the whole length of the hose is part of the compression volume, that pressure is allowed to bleed during every engine exhaust cycle and your pressure reading will be lower.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
je suis charlie
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
This only applies to conventional valve timing engines, not those with delayed intake valve closing.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
It's more complex than that.
Typical combustion chamber volume for a 2.0 liter 4 cylinder is 50cc or so.
Assume a perfect flat top piston to make the math easy. For a 500c displacement cylinder:
CR = (500+50)/50
CR = 11:1
Now add the hose:
CR = (500+53.5)/53.5
CR = 10.3:1
7 tenths of a point in compression ratio is a huge change.
11*14.7 = 161.7 psi
10.3*14.7 = 151.4 psi
10 psi is significant.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
The pressure gauge reads in psig so the gauge readings will actually be 147 psig and 136.7, respectively. Details are important in engineering. Like, upon which end of the hose should the valve be placed?
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Anyway I think we all get the point by now.
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location
Clearance volume = 50cc.
Hose adds 3.5cc. (7%)
Reading changes about 7%.
je suis charlie
RE: Compression Testers and Schrader Valve Location