×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

3D Scatter Plot

3D Scatter Plot

3D Scatter Plot

(OP)
Hello,
I have been trying to create a scatter plot - the obvious way to create one is a surface "z" as a function of two variables "x" and "y", but that's not what I want to do. I have a 3-dimensional data set and I just want to see it. The Mathcad graph "3D Scatter Plot" isn't giving me what I am looking for.

My dataset has thousands of points. For extreme simplicity I will demonstrate my problem with 3 points, by giving you their XYZ coordinates:

1,2,3
4,5,6
7,8,9

To my mind, that is 3 points. 3D Surface Plot puts 9 points on the graph. It seems to be mistaking the row and rank of the matrix with data. If the row and rank were important, I would use that, but they aren't. Should I be using some other kind of chart to plot this?
I have reconfigured the inputs for this graph as vectors, matrices, and entered them separately as vectors for each coordinate, to no avail.

A file is attached. Mathcad 13 or earlier, please.


RE: 3D Scatter Plot

(OP)
What do the brackets you put around x,y,z have to do with the presentation of the result?

Anyway, thank you - I don't know why, but it works.

RE: 3D Scatter Plot

I'm not sure why the brackets have an effect on the presentation, but hey, don't question what works, right?

S&T - www.re-tug.com

RE: 3D Scatter Plot

As usual Mathcad's Help is a obtuse; nevertheless, the 3D plot is one of the few things that Mathsoft dig well in Mathcad, and is actually better than the comparable facility in Excel which uses a dumb as dirt dialog box to change orientations.



TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

RE: 3D Scatter Plot

It has been a long time since I have done anything in MathCad, but those brackets around the values make those numbers into vectors in MathCad so they can be used in Matrix processing. I hope that helps in answering your question.


Jim



RE: 3D Scatter Plot

(OP)
Well now that it works, here's what I wanted to do. Knowing the trick and I did get the thing plotted in 10 minutes like I wanted to.

The plot compares the measurement from a current sensor in various conditions. The current produced by the generator should be zero up to a certain speed threshold, then increase linearly at higher speeds. At different temperatures the sensor's sensitivity seems to change, but I wasn't sure. I wanted to spend 10 minutes exporting the data table from Excel to Mathcad and plot the 3d scatter to see it. Little did I expect it to take 2 hours doing consistently the wrong thing in MC. Which is about as long as it would have taken to do it normally in Excel but hey I'm still a MC fan despite its quirks.

Visualizing the data made it clear that the trends are hard to see in the hash of values from the current sensor. That in itself is annoying, and could be a good reason to choose a different sensor for this job. There may also be too much noise from something else in the system. I didn't even think of it at the time, but now I want to add at least a capacitor from Vcc to Ground on the sensor to see if that helps.

RE: 3D Scatter Plot

A surface plot might be more apropos. Nevertheless, the trends appear to partially support your statements, but the bigger issue is that the data doesn't appear to cover the threshold conditions particularly well in some cases, or not at all, and in other cases, it doesn't cover the current rise vs. rpm slope regime. Note that copper resistivity is temperature dependent, so some variation with temperature would be expected, even if the sensor was thermally stable.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close