×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Hydraulic thrust K factor rule of thumb?

Hydraulic thrust K factor rule of thumb?

Hydraulic thrust K factor rule of thumb?

(OP)
We repair vertical motors, sometimes see premature thrust bearing failure that needs to be explained. Assessing the load requires K factor data on the pump that is often unknown. A recent example: 800hp 1800rpm motor rated 10,300lbs downthrust - on a site visit we recorded production of 2500gpm at 56hz (1688rpm) using 625hp, has a 2-7/16 inch lineshaft, 18 inch discharge head, no nameplate. The operator is certain the pump is set around 750 feet, but has no record of what bowls are installed. Shafting alone weighs nearly 12,000lbs so seems obvious there's a problem, question is what motor downthrust rating is really needed.

In the Pentair online electronic catalog (very cool, with multispeed curves and lots of data), using hypothetical conditions (2500gpm, 720TDH), I find a 7 stage Fairbanks 17MS bowl unit that produces that flow & head at 1688rpm using 625hp, pretty much an exact match. It has a K factor of 21.11lbs/ft (x720 = 15,199), rotating element weight of 455lbs; adding those to the shaft weight (11,910) totals 30,853lbs downthrust.

So if that happens to be the bowl, our motor needs a 31,000lb downthrust rating (triple what it has now) - does that seem right?

To verify I searched for other manufacturer's online selectors, didn't really find anything. I expect a real pump engineer would just look at catalog bowl data (where the K factor is always shown per individual bowl at a given speed), do the math to see outcomes with multiple stages at different speeds and heads.

I understand (a little) how the K factor is all over the map depending on the relative axial/radial aspects of the impeller design (simple Bernoulli equations, maybe I'll solve some later, just for fun . . .). Meantime, are we on the right track here, or might there be some other bowl unit down there that could produce this same flow and head at 5 lbs/ft, or 40 lbs/ft?

Most pump stations we see these days have VFDs and flowmeters, so it's easy to collect a lot of data (flows and horsepowers at different speeds for testing), which leaves guessing at the pumping water level (though sometimes that's known also) and maybe setting length (though mostly the operators have a pretty good idea of that, having paid by the foot). Is there a rough rule of thumb for K factor estimation in applications like this?



RE: Hydraulic thrust K factor rule of thumb?

None of our deep well pumps are that large. The closest example we have is rated to 1500 gpm at 700 feet of head at 1760 rpm. Our line shaft is 1-15/16".
That one is 7 stages and is down 460 feet. The normal thrust is about 12,000 lbs with a maximum at dead head of about 14,000 lbs and a minimum at end of curve of about 10,000 lbs. Our motor has a thrust bearing rated for 15,000 lbs continuous down thrust. Given the larger and longer line shaft, it seems perfectly reasonable to me that you could have a thrust load of 30,000 lbs.

Johnny Pellin

RE: Hydraulic thrust K factor rule of thumb?

Think it is a given that in the case you have described, the thrust bearing download is well under-rated.
That's assuming the motor is carrying the shaft and hydraulic load and not a seperate thrust assembly at the discharge head.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close