Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
(OP)
Mazda, and a lot of other makes, have a large. and unused as far as I can tell, area at the top of their bell housings.
What's it for?
I wouldn't think it's needed for MOI, which is already enormous.
And why the double walls at certain points around the periphery?
What's it for?
I wouldn't think it's needed for MOI, which is already enormous.
And why the double walls at certain points around the periphery?

RE: Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
Consider that the bottom of the engine block is not far from the crankshaft CL (even coincident on older designs).
je suis charlie
RE: Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
A guy on a Miata forum who seems knowledgeable said "Bending strength and stiffness of the engine/transmission assembly. The drivetrain is structural in the Miata, there are no transmission mounts."
Surprising if the entire trans is cantilevered from the engine.
RE: Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
RE: Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
So while the trans isn't cantilevered, its connection to that frame makes it part of a long beam in bending.
RE: Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?
Lotus SID was designed to be built in that configuration, as a possibility (every bush in the spine chassis and end subframes and driveline mounts had the same form factor, and we had a kit of parts so we could rebuild it in many different configs) , but I don't think they ever tested that one.
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?