×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
To Your Posts
• Keyword Search
• One-Click Access To Your
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
On Your Posts
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Entropy of superheated steam

 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs

Entropy of superheated steam

(OP)
Hello, I am a process engineering student and I need to do some calculations on superheated steam.
I want to calculate entropy for producing steam under specific conditions. I already used the h,s-Diagram and this site: https://www.spiraxsarco.com/resources-and-design-t... to calculate the Entropy. I get the same result every time. For steam at 60 bars gauge, and 365 C I get a entropy value of about 6.4 kJ/kg*K.
But when I do the math with the equations and values from steam tables I always get a value below of 6.2 kJ/kg*K.
I am using these equations: https://www.engineeringenotes.com/thermal-engineer...
With the same values for cp and enthalpy of evaporation as in the calculator.
Why is that, arent the calculators supposed to to exact this thing?
I need to be able to comprehend where the values come from, and 6.4 seems to be right. So what is wrong with the equations.. I hope someone can help me with this I am willing to provide any information.

Best regards,
schniels

RE: Entropy of superheated steam

Rounding differences in the actual arithmetic could lead to this difference - it seems to me that both sources are giving you practically the same answer.

RE: Entropy of superheated steam

(OP)
So Ive been told now that using the diagram and the calculator is more accurate because they are based on real measured data.
With the equations being an approximation, so relying on the measured values is always the go-to with well researched topics like water.
Thank you really much for your time.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a partâ€™s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.