×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Motor Starting Current 2

## Motor Starting Current

(OP)
Hello Everyone,

I read in the literature for motors that I_start = (NEMA_CODE x HP)/ sqrt(3)x V

However for a lower voltage at starting, the starting current decreases, but this formula insinuates the opposite. it is kind of confusing.

Any guidance?

Samy

### RE: Motor Starting Current

Here is a reference from the engineering toolbox
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/locked-rotor-co..., NEMA Code formula is related to locked rotor kVA/hp. This originates from NEMA Standards MG 1 – 10.37.2.

You can also find that the motor design starting torque and nema code are related. Within some physics constraints this is a design selection.

### RE: Motor Starting Current

2
For a given KVA/HP, the motor rated current is inversely proportional to the rated voltage. Higher the rated voltage, lower the rated run (and the rated start) current. And vice versa.

Key word here is rated.

When you apply a lower voltage at start, it is NOT the rated voltage. Hence the start current at this lower voltage is reduced proportionately from the rated start current.

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

### RE: Motor Starting Current

Did you mean a denominator of (sqrt(3)x V) because the formula is wrong without the brackets.

### RE: Motor Starting Current

samy81

I can see that the concept of starting kva/hp can be misleading to the extent it may be (incorrectly) interpretted to imply that the motor acts like a constant kva device during start.

In fact the starting kva of a given motor is not constant as voltage changes, the starting impedance is. So in this respect, a starting motor acts like a constant impedance device, not a constant kva device.

As edison mentioned the only context in which we can use starting kva/hp to compute starting current is at RATED voltage. To correct to any other voltage, you need to use constant-starting-impedance model (a fractional change in voltage causes a corresponding fractional change in starting current, at least to a first approximation)

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

### RE: Motor Starting Current

(OP)

@ LionelHutz yes that is correct the denominator is (sqrt(3)x V)

### RE: Motor Starting Current

(OP)
Thank you everyone for your replies. I actually came to the same conclusion that this formula can only be used for RATED voltage

### RE: Motor Starting Current

Yes, the shortcut quick formulas being applied to motors all have limitations.

### RE: Motor Starting Current

Samy81: Yes - within the constraints of factors which affect impedance, the "basic" short cut formulae can achieve fairly realistic approximations for certain changes. As you have already noted, the relationship between starting (inrush) current and applied line voltage is more-or-less linear, at least when you talk about per unit values. What this really means is that when rated (1.0 pu) volts is applied, the inrush current is also 1.0 pu. If a lesser voltage such as 0.8 pu is applied, then the starting current will be likewise reduced to 0.8 pu.

Furthermore, the relationship between applied voltage and starting torque is a square law. This means that a 1.0 pu voltage will result in the machine developing 1.0 pu starting torque (and thus accelerating torque). At reduced voltage - like 0.8 pu - the developed torque is 0.8 * 0.8 = 0.64 pu of the RATED starting (and accelerating) torque. This is why having too much line drop (or too little transformer) between the utility and the machine can cause the motor to be unable to accelerate the driven load.

In essence, the correct machine model is indeed a "constant impedance" approach, rather than a "constant kva" approach.

Converting energy to motion for more than half a century

### RE: Motor Starting Current

(OP)
@Gr8blu: The "constant impedance" model is only valid for a "starting" state but when the motor is in "running" state the "constant KVA" model is applicable. I think it is important to notice the difference as this will lead to different behavior vis-à-vis the voltage

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

#### Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a partâ€™s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!