×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Uplift Load Cases formula(Table 5.20) in API 650 13th edition different from 12th edition ???

Uplift Load Cases formula(Table 5.20) in API 650 13th edition different from 12th edition ???

Uplift Load Cases formula(Table 5.20) in API 650 13th edition different from 12th edition ???

(OP)
I found out that the formula for Uplift Load Cases in Table 5.20b is different in the 13th edition from that of the 12th edition. Also, W1, W2, and W3 are defined differently in the 13th edition. Will it make a huge difference if we follow the 12th edition rather than the 13th edition in this case?

Can anybody please reply asap?

RE: Uplift Load Cases formula(Table 5.20) in API 650 13th edition different from 12th edition ???

Sorry, no "ASAP" due to having to look up two or three different things to compare.
First off, the last addendum of the 12th edition appears to be the same as the 13th. Per the margin markings, these were updated in both the 2014 and 2015
The prior addendum includes a t-h term in the pressure component and excludes it in the weight definitions. Basically, that 8t-h is the roof weight, converted to inches of water and rounded off.
It seems the last several editions have continuously revised the overturn and uplift criteria. Some of this seems to be updates, some is just corrections in previous updates. I think some of this is trying to align the code with newer ASCE 7 provisions. Some of it is trying to reconcile wind uplift on the roof, which physics says is there, with the fact that the tanks generally don't blow over, either.
Most of these terms, if you work through the units, are just P/A and Mc/I type calculations.
A more specific question may get you a better answer.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close