Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Boundary condition

Boundary condition

Boundary condition

Hi everybody! I'm analyzing with Patran and Nastran a multi-arch structure where the arches are made of a sandwich material (so I used 3D elements for the core e 2D elements for the upper and lower faces). The problem that I have is related to the boundary condition because as you can see in the picture at the end of each arch there will be a hinge condition, in order to have a rotation around one axis, and that's why I used also RBE2. The problem is when I've to set the boundary condition for the arches rotated by 45° with respect to the axis Y-axis. I thought to use a different Coord system but it seems useless because when I run the analysis there is a difference between the arches aligned with the principal Coord system of Patran and the other rotated by 45°. I hope that is clear my message.

RE: Boundary condition

Post a plot of the deformed geometry. Have no idea what your issue is.

What is the loading?

RE: Boundary condition

Hi SWComposites, here are two pictures that can help. The structure is symmetric and the load is also symmetric and as you can see from the picture the load is higher in the center and decrease along the arches. In the center, there is a pressure. So if the load is symmetric and the structure is symmetric I suppose that the displacements are symmetric.

RE: Boundary condition

Do the RBE2s at the base connect to all dofs?

Are the reaction loads at all 8 base nodes the same?

Are your element material coordinate systems all aligned in the same way along the legs?

The base coordinate systems look ok, as do the base constraints. There is something subtly different between the legs. Try changing all of the material properties to purely isotropic.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close