Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Structural Analysis Software for Floating Pontoons/Docks 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Simba13

Simba13

Structural
Joined
May 19, 2020
Messages
105
Location
US
Good Morning all,

I was wondering if any of you have a recommendation for software to perform structural analysis on floating marina docks (concrete). I've just been mostly using hand calcs to get the loads and running it in RISA (this is the way my boss does it). I've spoken with a few people in the field and they say that's fine, but I always feel like I'm oversimplifying a bit. FYI I use miche rungren for wave loads.

Thanks!
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
I have used RISA-3D to design floating docks for dead and live load, mooring load, and ice load.

DaveAtkins
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Simba - unless you're doing nothing but floating docks every day, specialty software won't be worth it. Oversimplification, if taken in the correct direction, is going to give you conservative designs. When dealing with waterfront structures like you are that's typically going to be the best way to do it. If you're building a a multi-million or billion dollar port, then sharpen the pencil. But for a marina or even a small commercial terminal, simple and conservative is the way to go.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yeah, that seems to be the consensus among the other people I've spoken with. Some of these are heavy duty, the one I'm working on now is 462' long (haven't asked about the price tag) so I just figured I'd confirm with some other engineers. My boss has worked out a very good procedure for the loads and I'm not doubting it or anything. I guess I just get a little cagey when you talk about such a complex loading environment in reality and then simplifying it down. Also I'm a nerd and if I can build a more complex model I'll try to find an excuse to do so. [2thumbsup]

Thanks!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Simba13 said:
I'm a nerd and if I can build a more complex model I'll try to find an excuse to do so.
Click to expand...

I'm right there with you, but keep in mind this other thing you said:

Simba13 said:
such a complex loading environment
Click to expand...

The more complex you make your model to account for the loading, the more fine tuned it gets to handle that specific load. In such a complex environment, those blinders can be disastrous. Your model has to be equally complex for each complex load if you try to make it that accurate. Some form of the law of diminishing returns certainly applies here, and if you're not careful you'll end up sitting on, at best, an unconservative, upper bound solution to one or two possible scenarios, and your structure will be hit by scenario 63.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
phamENG Yep, I definitely get it. I think I'm more or less ready to put the modeling concerns to rest. Although I may bug you guys again in the future about some assumptions for the vertical wave load distribution.

Thanks! phamENG & DaveAtkins
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I used to work in offshore and API RP 2A has some pretty straight forward wave load calculations, or at least it was back in late 90's.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

L
  • Question Question
Recommendations for Software Tools Using Structural Design Codes
Replies
0
Views
1K
Lauranmoreno
L
M
  • Locked
Analysis Software for Formwork Operations
Replies
0
Views
985
mrz36
M
S
  • Question Question
Structural Engineering books for donation
Replies
6
Views
7K
SSS148
S
civilsub911
  • Locked
Seismic analysis using Tekla Structural Designer
Replies
0
Views
1K
civilsub911
civilsub911
Costin Ruja
  • Question Question
Floating concrete slab on wood trusses
Replies
5
Views
7K
phamENG
phamENG

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top