×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

The global cubes algorithm by Immel et al: Is it a particularization of discrete ordinates?

The global cubes algorithm by Immel et al: Is it a particularization of discrete ordinates?

The global cubes algorithm by Immel et al: Is it a particularization of discrete ordinates?

(OP)
There are situations where the overlap of knowledge and research between radiative heat transfer and radiosity confuses me. While radiosity (a computer graphics technique) was developed using radiative heat transfer as its base ground (acknowledged fact by the early/pioneering radiosity researchers), however there are times where I don't understand if they forgot to cite some heat transfer papers, or if actually they are talking about a different thing.

One such example is non-diffuse reflection. For example, in "A Radiosity Method for Non-Diffuse Environments" by Immel, Cohen, Greenberg, they propose using "global cubes" which basically discretize directions for the solid angles of each cell in each cube. This really sounds to me like the discrete ordinates method, but however in their paper they don't cite Chandrasekhar nor mention discrete ordinates at all. Am I missing something, or maybe they developed their algorithm without knowing the existence of discrete ordinates?

What's more, you can read a further development of the "global cubes" algorithm, using spherical harmonics to avoid aliasing artifacts due to the discretization of directions, this time in the paper "A global illumination solution for general reflectance distributions" by Sillion, Arvo, Westin, Greenberg, and they don't mention the discrete ordinates method either.

Am I right in concluding that they are talking basically about ways of applying the discrete ordinates method, but that for some reason they didn't know of its existence? Or am I missing some detail which makes their approach totally different?

RE: The global cubes algorithm by Immel et al: Is it a particularization of discrete ordinates?

I would start by contacting Prof. Donald P. Greenberg at Cornell University. No one besides the paper authors can help you discover what the authors were thinking.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close