Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

AWWA D103 TANK SEISMIC DESIGN FACTORS

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeG7

Mechanical
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
199
Location
ZA
Hi All

Reference tank design for seismic to AWWA D103 standard:

I'm a bit puzzled trying to understand the wording included in the above standard under Section 14: Seismic Design.

It says:

"The design design seismic forces have been reduced by a factor of 1.4 and shall be used with the allowable strength design method".

This reduction is applied in the formula for calculating the design acceleration, A, which is used to determine the lateral forces for overturning moments and base shear. In that formula (Eq. 14-16) which is generally written as
A = S*I/R
where
S is the spectral response acceleration
I is the importance factor
R is the Response modification factor depending on type of structure and extent of anchorage

The "A" is reduced by a factor of 1.4

My question is that in API-650 which has a similar design procedure, the reduction factor of 1.4 is not included.
I believe both AWWA D103 and API-650 both use the allowable strength design method.

Could this be explained by those more familiar with the above codes.

Thanks
Michael
 
I don't have the D103 code handy.
The D100 code uses R=3.0 anchored and 2.5 unanchored.
API-650 uses R=4.0 anchored and 3.5 unanchored.
If D103 uses the same R values as D100, part or all of that 1.4 factor may be included in the R values.
 

Both API 650 and AWWA use ASD and 1.4 factor is included in R (Response Modification Factors for ASD Methods ) values for API tanks.

API 650 =
for Self-anchored tanks Ri= 3.5 , Rc =2
for Mechanically-anchored Ri= 4 , Rc= 2



AWWA =

for Self-anchored tanks Ri= 2.5 , Rc =1.5

for Mechanically-anchored Ri= 3.0 , Rc= 1.5

for elevated tanks Ri= 3.0 , Rc= not applicable ( if the fluid–structure interaction procedure is not used.)


 
I see now that the 1.4 factor is found in the differences in the value of 'R' between the different standards.
It makes sense - thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top