×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Allowable bearing forces due to unbalance

Allowable bearing forces due to unbalance

Allowable bearing forces due to unbalance

(OP)
My company designs gear reducers with attachments. The balance quality of the attachments follows our company standards but it's a very basic practice. These are rigid rotors operating safely below first critical speed.

Balance quality can be calculated from the allowable bearing forces. How might I determine my allowable bearing forces? I can think of a few options but I'd love to know if there are good rules of thumb or other design practices to consider.

Thanks, David
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Allowable bearing forces due to unbalance

Direct coupled ? Belt drive?
Rolling element bearings or some flavor of journal bearings?

What is the nature and function of these "attachments?" Are they heavy, or cantilevered, or is their function to make aggressive interrupted cuts in slabs of oak or to claw deep trenches in the earth ?

I think the reaction forces from the gearing are likely to be much higher than "centrifugal force" from an "attachment" balanced per ISO 1940/1 G 6.3 which is a general machinery balance tolerance.
If the bearings are as rugged as I'm AssUmINg, the unbalance that will create a force equal to 10% of the bearing capacity may well cause noticeable and unacceptable amounts of 1X vibration in operation.

I'm thinking API or AGMA has much to say about gearbox component balancing, but masybe not "attachements."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close