×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

(OP)
My question is : Can we get a hint about overall structural behaviour of a system from modal analysis ? Such as: even under a static case the system will try to deform like its mode shapes. Is this statement true ? I am trying to understand what can I get from modal analysis so I can use these informations in the early design phase of a system. (Where to add more parts/structural elements etc.)

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

Modal analysis (eigenfrequency extraction) is often needed for other dynamic simulations that utilize modal superposition method. It's also possible to obtain participation factors from these analyses. They indicate the direction for which the mode will be most easily excited or will have the strongest response. Yet another output is modal effective mass - it tells you how much each mode contributes to total mass of the model for motion in a given direction. Modal analyses are often used to check connections in assemblies (if some part is unconnected, it will detach from the rest of the structure). Also, the first natural frequency can be used to estimate impact velocity for quasi-static simulations.

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

"the first natural frequency can be used to estimate impact velocity for quasi-static simulations" … can you explain more please ? links ??

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

That's something Abaqus/Explicit users are taught. The procedure is as follows:
- determine the lowest natural frequency
- calculate the corresponding time period (t) from that frequency
- estimate the deflection in the direction of impact (d)
- calculate impact velocity: v=d/t
- make sure that v is less than 1% of the wave speed of particular material

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

That is a general trick/recipe/hack users of other codes follow as well. Here is one such example. In the link I shared they also show how to go about choosing damping parameters based off of an eigenvalue analysis.

*********************************************************
Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

"even under a static case the system will try to deform like its mode shapes. Is this statement true ? "

Not generally true, no. The response at 0 Hz is governed by the low frequency residuals of the modes, is the closest I'd get to that. Often the lowest frequency mode dominates, but that is very dependent on the point of application of the load and its direction.

Once you have a correlated set of modes then you can be fairly sure your model isn't fundamentally wrong, and you can go ahead and use it for other linear range simulations.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

Structure will buckle with first mode shape. If the structure is preloaded with critical buckling load then its first frequency in prestressed modal analysis will be zero.

RE: What can we get from modal analysis beside natural frequencies and corresponding shapes ?

Not generally true. A car does not buckle at the first resonance, which is bouncing on the springs.

"even under a static case the system will try to deform like its mode shapes. Is this statement true ? "

Still no, but if you just hit a system, much of the response will usually be at the first mode shape.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close