Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Composite modelling using solid laminates (PCOMPS)

Composite modelling using solid laminates (PCOMPS)

Composite modelling using solid laminates (PCOMPS)

Hi all,
I've been attempting to model a complex structure using solid laminate properties. The structure is complex as each ply is actually made up of different patches of plies running in different directions.
For example, the top ply has a region with 0 degree plies, and another region with 45 degree plies. On top of that, the section is quite thick (Upwards of 50 plies thick).
To model this problem I decided to use multiple elements through the thickness, and 'repeat' the lay-up stack down the thickness (as it's Quasi isotropic, the lay-up naturally repeats). This allows me to re-use a single layup and property multiple times through the thickness. For the 'patches' of different layup I simply assigned different lay-ups to those regions.
The model runs fine, but I am having difficulty postprocessing to give the necessary result outputs and to interpret the outputs correctly. So I have a few questions that I'm hoping someone may be able to help with :)
1. I need to visualise the complete Failure Index plot for the entire laminate. Can I simply envelop all the Failure results for all failure directions across all plies? I haven't looked too much into this but my first attempts were not successful.
2. Can I use the "Custom tools - postprocessing - Laminate Envelope Failure Indices" with solid laminate sections? I have not been able to find info on how this works, and so have not been able to use it.
3. Separately, I am struggling to find the best way to number the plies considering the piecewise changes in stacking sequence across the surface. Is it ok to assign two different direction plies to the same global stack number? For instance, in one lay-up assign the first global ply ID to the first ply (45 deg) and in the next lay-up assign the same global ID to a ply with a different orientation (0 degree). Will this impact on the transformation of strains during the Failure index calculation?
4. When 'repeating' lay-ups through multiple elements through the thickness, is it best to remove global ply IDs?

Thanks for reading and any help you can give!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Functional Prototyping Using Metal 3D Printing
Functional prototypes are a key step in product development – they give engineers a chance to test new ideas and designs while also revealing how the product will stand up to real-world use. And when it comes to functional prototypes, 3D printing is rewriting the rules of what’s possible. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close