×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Fatigue Doubt

Fatigue Doubt

Fatigue Doubt

(OP)
I plan to run analyze a locomotive body structure for + (or) - 20 % vertical loading and use eurocode for aluminium structures for damage calculation .

I plan to run the model for +1.2g and 0.8 g in abaqus.

To calculate the stress range
I plan consider the max principal stress for 1.2g and max. principal stress for 0.8 g.

Stress range = Max Stress at 1.2g - Max Stress at 0.8g
Is my approach of calculating stress range fine ?

In the same element ID where is checked the max.principal, the compressive stresses (min.principal) is zero or negligible?
Hence i ignored the compressive stresses ? is it fine ?

However if i check min. principal in the first place, the maximum compressive stress is on a different location ? So, should i consider the compressive stresses fro stress range calculation ? will it contribute to the fatigue failure ?

RE: Fatigue Doubt

You're running linear FEM, yes?

so you don't need to rerun cases for factored loads. You can run a 1g loadase, then factor by 1.2 and 0.8 (post-process).

the max principal stress for 1.2g will be 1.2* the max principal stress from 1g run
the max principal stress for 0.8g will be 0.8* the max principal stress from 1g run … and will be the same element
so the stress range will be 1.2g - 0.8g = 0.4g* the max principal stress from 1g run.
and the stress ratio, R = min/max, will be 0.8/1.2 = 0.6667

I think neglecting the compression component is reasonable, but you do need to check/verify that compressions are low
max principal or von mises are both good stresses for fatigue.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Fatigue Doubt

(OP)
Thank you . Your answers were helpful.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close