×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Nm3/hr

Nm3/hr

(OP)
Hi, could someone explain if this is correct? I never see liquid using Nm3/hr before.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Nm3/hr

Wouldn't the relieving rate be attributed to steam in this case?

The purpose of the PSV would be for potential steam buildup in case of a fire, right?

Andrew H.
www.MotoTribology.com

RE: Nm3/hr

Don't over think this.

But why are you relieving fire water? NFPA doesn't like this.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Nm3/hr

Agree with littleinch - is just m3/hr but why a PSV on the fire water system?

RE: Nm3/hr

Mn3/hr is the equivalent flow at standard conditions of 0 Deg C(liquid).

If your fire water is at a different temperation, you can correct it, but likely an extremely minor correction.

Use of relief valve in the pump discharge is concerning, considering the possibilty of valve failure.

RE: Nm3/hr

Don't mess with fire water systems.

They are not normal, but the work of the devil (aka NFPA). IMHO.

Find something more useful to work on.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Nm3/hr

Quote (LittleInch)

Don't mess with fire water systems.

They are not normal, but the work of the devil (aka NFPA). IMHO.

Couldn't agree more. Every single time I got into design a fire water system, I was riddled with all the nonsense in that "industry".

Daniel
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

RE: Nm3/hr

(OP)
Thanks everyone, if Nm3/hr is flow at standard condition, I think I can use m3/hr instead.

RE: Nm3/hr

Why would you need to correct for temperature and pressure since it is liquid in which case compressibility is negligible? If at all, might expect discrepancies but not much?

If you plan an escape, you must succeed as if you fail, you will be punished for trying. Never say or write down your plan. Heart is the only place where secrecy is granted.

RE: Nm3/hr

The OP should consult the official relief record and see what the PRD Engineer’s intent was.

Good Luck,
Latexman

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close