×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Wind loading on irregular structure

Wind loading on irregular structure

Wind loading on irregular structure

(OP)
I am working on a 1 story house with a roof that is vertically offset at the center (please see the attached image). As you can see in the plan view, there are also some horizontal offsets.

For the wind loading, I would prefer to use the envelope procedure, part 2 of ASCE Chapter 28 since that is the method I am most comfortable using. However I'm thinking there are too many irregularities for this to be considered a simple diaphragm building.

Any advice would be appreciated - thanks!

RE: Wind loading on irregular structure

"The Analysis of Irregular Shaped Structures" by Malone and Rice is a great resource for this sort of thing.

RE: Wind loading on irregular structure

(OP)
Thanks Simba13 - I bought the Kindle version of that book a few days ago, it's a great book. In section 2.3 it has the following regarding the calculation of wind loads:

2.3 Load Distribution into a Diaphragm
IBC Section 1609.1.1 allows the determination of wind loads to be in accordance with ASCE 7-05 Chap. 6 or by the “Alternate all-heights method” of IBC Section 1609.6. Any method can be used as long as the method is applicable to irregular-shaped structures and separates the wind loads onto the windward, leeward, and side walls of the building and properly accesses the internal forces in the main wind force-resisting system (MWFRS). Simplified procedures intended for rectangular structures should not be used for irregular-shaped structures.

I couldn't find any examples in the book where wind loads are calculated - the loading is just shown as xxx plf applied to the structure. Based on the paragraph above, I think I should use Chapter 28 part 1 method for determining the wind loads.

Does anyone know of some practical examples where the wind loads using this method are calculated and applied to a structure?

RE: Wind loading on irregular structure

Yeah, I suspect that if it went into calculating the wind loads as well that would be a whole 'nother book. I'm not expert, and others might disagree, but I feel like getting your pressures should be the same as a uniform rectangular building. You can use the envelope method as you stated, I'm a fan of the directional procedure myself (easier to make a spreadsheet for). I think the irregularities come into play more on a load path level, making sure you have an appropriately designed diaphragm, either through transfer diaphragms or just breaking up the house into sub-diaphragms (I think it's generally done this way), and then making sure you have the appropriate wind bracing (wind controls over seismic in my area, may not be the case there).

RE: Wind loading on irregular structure

(OP)
Wind often controls here.... I would like to just calculate the pressures assuming a regular shaped building, but the paragraph I quoted from Malone's book made me question whether I should do that. I'll look into using the directional procedure if it's easier to setup a spreadsheet for that method. Thanks!

RE: Wind loading on irregular structure

I think that the simplified procedures they are referring to something like Part 2 of Chapter 28. If you look at ASCE 7-10 28.1.1 it says "Part 1 applies to all low- rise buildings ..." but then 2) is only for enclosed simple diaphragms. So I think you're good using Part 1. In the first place the house you're designing is not mega-irregular, from looking at it, it looks just slightly different from a simple rectangular diaphragm. I'd be interested to see if someone disagrees but as far as pressures go I think you'll be fine using that procedure.

RE: Wind loading on irregular structure

(OP)
I think I agree - Ch 28, part 2 should not be used. Thanks for your opinion, I appreciate it. I may have further questions once I start calculating the loads (I mostly use part 2, so I need to brush up on the other method).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Reshoring Prototyping and Production
In this whitepaper, we'll provide insight into why and when it makes sense for U.S. manufacturers to reshore prototyping and production, and how companies can leverage the benefits of working with local design, prototype, and manufacturing partners during the pandemic and beyond. Download Now
Engineering Report - Top 10 Defect Types in Production
This 22-page report from Instrumental identifies the most common production defect types discovered in 2020, showcases trends from 2019 to 2020, and provides insights on how to prevent potential downtime in 2021. Unlike other methods, Instrumental drives correlations between a variety of data sources to help engineers find and fix root causes. Download Now
White Paper - Addressing Tooling and Casting Requirements at the Design Stage
Several of the tooling and casting requirements of a part can be addressed at the design stage. If these requirements are not addressed at the design stage, lot of time is spent in design iteration when the design reaches the die caster. These design issues lead to increase in time and cost of production leading to delay in time to market and reduced profits for the organization. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close