×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

DIB-1 Valve Cavity Relief

DIB-1 Valve Cavity Relief

DIB-1 Valve Cavity Relief

(OP)
Do DIB-1 valves ALWAYS require a means of relieving cavity pressure (either automatically or manually as per API 6D)? My confusion is, for liquid service there should always be an LRK as thermal expansion is likely, but in gas service, is a means of relief required? API 6D is kind of vague as it says if fluid trapping in the cavity is possible (which is always the case with any valve?), and what if it is a CSA valve? My understanding is that due to the DPE seats it must have some means of relief (auto or otherwise) in case u/s seat fails for whatever reason.

Thanks

RE: DIB-1 Valve Cavity Relief

What's an LRK?

If the valve is in gas service and you can show that from max operating pressure the gas can't create pressure bother than the valve design pressure die to temperature increase then no, I don't believe it needs a pressure relief. But liquid yes.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: DIB-1 Valve Cavity Relief

Cavity relief is a default requirement if trapping of fluid is required, UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED. This does not care if it's liquid or gas, it's just that for liquid, it's faster for the trapped pressure to build up due to lack of compressibility.

Thus, the answer is NO, it's not always required, but it's highly desirable.

Luke | Valve Hax | https://valvehax.com/

RE: DIB-1 Valve Cavity Relief

(OP)
Thanks guys. Hitokiri you are correct the 'unless otherwise agreed' clause exempts gas (as does the compressibility of gas as you would have to overpressure piping to overpressure valve cavity...) - classic vague code where they say fluid but gas is essentially always exempt.

Hitokiri, there are lots of issues we are experiencing associated with tubing (namely tubing relief commonly occuring and the valve becoming essentailly a DBB afterwards as pressure is required on both sides of the seat to hold and oftgen the tubing is being ran to the incorrect side; U/S vs. D/S confusion, tubing freezing, plugging, leaking etc.) so we are trying to avoid DIB-1 valves as they don't add any value in standard applications/operations when the relief tubing is either piped u/s or d/s..

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - The Future of Product Development is Here
Looking to make the design and manufacturing of your products more agile? For engineering and manufacturing organizations, the need for digital transformation of product development processes just became more urgent than ever so we wanted to share an eBook that will help you build a practical roadmap for your journey. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close