Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Am I the only one who misses the V8i version?

Am I the only one who misses the V8i version?

Am I the only one who misses the V8i version?

I can't stand the Connect edition.

RE: Am I the only one who misses the V8i version?

All of it. Miss the old tool bars, editor, icons, interface......you name it.

Fortunately, I think I have (at least) found a way to get the old-school editor to come up.

RE: Am I the only one who misses the V8i version?

Yes the editor is still popular so we kept it (even though that made a few things difficult). The advanced editor went through some enhancements like syntax checking that I quite like.

RE: Am I the only one who misses the V8i version?

WARose, I'm guessing you don't use the physical modeler. That seems to be the Connect Edition's claim to fame. I don't use it myself so while I wouldn't say I can't stand CE, I would say that I haven't seen any productivity gains. I did have a drop in productivity when I first started learning it because everything was in a different place. I'm pretty sure I'll never exceed the speed I could get around the GUI in the old version. Not sure I'll ever even totally match it.

I like the new editor fine though. It's been so long since I used the older one I don't really remember it. I've been using CE pretty much since it came out.

Getting back to the physical modeler. I took a look at it quite a while back. I thought they would take this opportunity to no longer have physical members and analytical members. I used a program years ago that allowed you to think of members as their physical representation but behind the scenes it knew how to break it up for analysis. To me, the fact that you have to segregate the two even in the way you load them is just ridiculous. Maybe one day I'll try it again but I doubt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close