Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
(OP)
I have an installation where a pneumatic chemical pump is approx. 100 FT from a wellhead. The chemical injection pump discharge 316SS tubing is buried around 4 FT deep, comes above ground and connects to a 316SS ball valve, check valve and injection quill that is on a carbon steel flowline. The flowline has a dielectric kit on the flange before the flowline goes underground towards the facility. (there is cathodic protection on the buried flowline). The upstream side is the wellhead - around 10,000ft deep.
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
As for the connection to the pipe, small connections of noble metals to much larger systems usually pose little galvanic corrosion potential.
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
If the water table is 100' deep and this location NEVER gets rain then you have nothing to worry about.
But if this soil is ever damp then you have issues.
The two that are most common are chlorides and/or bacteria in the soil. Many bacteria excrete acids and then when they die they often acids are also formed.
Buried SS requires protection.
With so much area of CS and so little SS the only galvanic impact might be right adjacent to the fitting, but there won't be any real imapct.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
a) - to get it into the CP system for supplementary protection
b) - to lower the risk of stray current destroying the chemical line
If a) is adopted, then isolation from all the other buried metal in the well will be required
Steve Jones
Corrosion Management Consultant
www.linkedin.com/in/drstevejones
All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
Steve Jones
Corrosion Management Consultant
www.linkedin.com/in/drstevejones
All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
Steve Jones
Corrosion Management Consultant
www.linkedin.com/in/drstevejones
All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
'Steel' came from the engineering dept
'Stainless' came from the marketing dept
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
RE: Is a dielectric union required on 316SS tubing used for chemical injection.?
https://www.obcorp.com/product/tubing-bundle/coate...
If the chemical injection point is on the well side of the Isolation joint of the flowline ( I assume this is just in the same trench as your chemical line?) then you should be Ok, but if not you need to add an insulation joint.
Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.