Is this a solid-gas fluidized bed, doomster? Following off of Razookm's answer, you will need to ensure that your "fluidizing" unit can handle the increased flow rate if you simply inject 18,240 Nm3/hr N2 into a 3,040 Nm3/hr air stream. There is very little chance it is sized for an ~7x increase in superficial gas velocity. You would likely end up blowing everything out the top of the fluidizer unless you can bleed the excess flow somewhere else.
Since you would be consuming 18,240 Nm3/hr of N2 for what originally is a 3,040 Nm3/hr flow, why not just go the other way and flow pure N2 with a little bit of dilution air? I calculate you would need 2,624 Nm3/hr of pure N2 and 416 Nm3/hr air to achieve 97% N2. That will let you keep your original 3,040 Nm3/hr flow rate. If you must consume all 3,040 Nm3/hr of air (blower constraints, etc) and want to keep the 3,040 Nm3/hr total flow rate to the fluidizer, you could just bleed the excess air (~2,624 Nm3/hr), which would be far less than the 18,240 Nm3/hr bleed required if injecting N2 like in your OP.