×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

API 653 Hydrotest exemption

API 653 Hydrotest exemption

API 653 Hydrotest exemption

(OP)
Shell to bottom weld repair:
Repair of the weld attaching the shell to the annular ring or the shell to the bottom plate shall meet one of
the following requirements.
a) A portion of the weld (of any length) may be removed and replaced as long as the replaced weld meets the size
requirements of API 650, Section 5.1.5.7, and the portion replaced does not represent more than 50 % of the
required weld cross-sectional area.
b) The weld on one side of the shell may be completely removed and replaced for a length not exceeding 12 in.
Shell-to-bottom weld repairs replacing more than 50 % of the required weld cross-sectional area shall not be
closer than 12 in. to each other, including repairs on the opposite side of the shell.[/b]

The above sentences are from API 653. The requirement (a) states that one can remove and replace weld for any length if the replaced section doesn't exceed 50% of cross sectional area. The requirement (b) states that one side can be completely removed (which will be approx. 50% of the cross sectional area) but only for 12" length. Doesn't statement (a) and (b) are contradicting each other?
Can someone please elaborate on this.

RE: API 653 Hydrotest exemption


Quote (Inspector89 (Mechanical)


....The above sentences are from API 653. The requirement (a) states that one can remove and replace weld for any length if the replaced section doesn't exceed 50% of cross sectional area. The requirement (b) states that one side can be completely removed (which will be approx. 50% of the cross sectional area) but only for 12" length. Doesn't statement (a) and (b) are contradicting each other?
Can someone please elaborate on this.



There is no contradiction... The snap below (copy and paste from API 650 ) depicts the shell to bottom weld .




There are two fillet welds ...The requirements are clearly defined for the sizing of the welds. Say the interior weld area Ai and exterior Ae and say , weld defect at exterior..
Item a states, A portion of the weld (of any length) may be removed and replaced as long as the replaced weld meets the size
requirements of API 650, Section 5.1.5.7, and the portion replaced does not represent more than 50 % of the required weld cross-sectional area .That is , Aw shall be less than 50 % of the Ae.

Item b states,The weld on one side of the shell may be completely removed and replaced for a length not exceeding 12 in.
Shell-to-bottom weld repairs replacing more than 50 % of the required weld cross-sectional area shall not be closer than 12 in. to each other, including repairs on the opposite side of the shell. That is, if Ae removed completely,the length shall not exceed 12 in.

The removal of defective weld is carried out either by grinding or gouging or sometimes both .
For more info. pls look API 650 7.2.4 Shell-to-Bottom Welds.

Good luck.





Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close