×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Microstrip antennas vs simulation

Microstrip antennas vs simulation

Microstrip antennas vs simulation

(OP)
Hi all,

I used the article "Design of rectangular Microstrip Patch antennas for the 2.4 Ghz band" to design my own antenna, but as I don't have a lab at disposition to test this antenna, I desided to make a simulation of the antenna model from the paper and then to simulate "my own antenna"...

1) Using the formulas given in the article, I found a different result for the patch dimention : 38,6 mm instead of 36.84 mm given...

2)I simulate the original patch (36.84 mm) using EMPiCASSO ( http://www.empicasso.com/ )but found different results...

3)Even the corrected patch gives differents results once simulated with EMPiCASSO...

4) http://wes.feec.vutbr.cz/~raida/multimedia_en/ - TIP!! Go to visit this site I used to get more info...

I'd like to know if someone had the same experience and if there is some explainations for this !!??

Can I trust in the article or in the simulation ?

Can someone help ?

Thomas K.
http://www.genius.org.br
http://www.thomask.fr.st

RE: Microstrip antennas vs simulation

Suggestion: The most appropriate party to contact would be the software developer, i.e. empicasso. They are supposed to accept challenges and have the edge of knowing what is behind encrypted programs they developed. Undoubtedly, the latter somewhat disadvantages volunteers contributing to this Forum.

RE: Microstrip antennas vs simulation

(OP)
Jbartos,
 
I already contacted EMPiCASSO's technical support to try to get some explainations, I sent my file... but it seemed that my simulation was correct...

So I did the calculation again with a Mathlab Program and found a mistake in the paper !!
=> The last formula (page 28) that gives L=(c/(2*f0*sqrt(Eps_eff))-2*deltaL... the autor calculate L'=L-2*deltaL, I mean that he took the initial value (40.1 mm)instead of 41.82 mm if you calculate with Eps_eff instead of Epsr !!


Is that correct ??

Now I've another few questions... I have no laboratory here to perform experiments on my design so I must to calculate and simulate until to get a good result.

1) How can I be sure to get accurates results by simulation without to test all the time ?

2) Can someone gives me some idea of some paint or material I can use as "superstrate" (on the microstrip patch) to improve radiations carracteristics ?

Thanks,   

Thomas K.
http://www.genius.org.br
http://www.thomask.fr.st

RE: Microstrip antennas vs simulation

Suggestions to toulouse (Electrical) Feb 25, 2003 marked ///\\\
So I did the calculation again with a Mathlab Program and found a mistake in the paper !!
///Please, in which paper?\\\
=> The last formula (page 28) that gives L=(c/(2*f0*sqrt(Eps_eff))-2*deltaL... the autor calculate L'=L-2*deltaL, I mean that he took the initial value (40.1 mm)instead of 41.82 mm if you calculate with Eps_eff instead of Epsr !!

Is that correct ??

Now I've another few questions... I have no laboratory here to perform experiments on my design so I must to calculate and simulate until to get a good result.

1) How can I be sure to get accurates results by simulation without to test all the time ?
///Tests are needed. The tests can be omitted in well know or simple simulations.\\\
2) Can someone gives me some idea of some paint or material I can use as "superstrate" (on the microstrip patch) to improve radiations carracteristics ?
///Visit
http://nr.stic.gov.tw/ejournal/ProceedingA/v23n5/609-611.pdf
http://ndl.ee.ucr.edu/adam.pdf
etc. for more info\\\

RE: Microstrip antennas vs simulation

(OP)
Suggestions to toulouse (Electrical) Feb 25, 2003 marked ///\\\
So I did the calculation again with a Mathlab Program and found a mistake in the paper !!
///Please, in which paper?\\\

I'm Talking about the article "Design of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antennas for the 2.4 Ghz Band " Ammann, Max ... First part (probe feed), for the calculation of L.

Please tell me if I'm right or wrong !

Thomas K.
http://www.genius.org.br
http://www.thomask.fr.st

RE: Microstrip antennas vs simulation

HI FOLKS
I JOINT THIS FORUM TODAY .
I HAVE MANY QUESTION ABOUT DESIGN RECTANGULAR MICROSTRIP ANTENNA.
 PLEASE HELP ME.
 BYE

RE: Microstrip antennas vs simulation

Suggestion to toulouse (Electrical) Feb 25, 2003 marked ///\\\
Jbartos,
 I already contacted EMPiCASSO's technical support to try to get some explainations, I sent my file... but it seemed that my simulation was correct...

So I did the calculation again with a Mathlab Program and found a mistake in the paper !!
=> The last formula (page 28) that gives L=(c/(2*f0*sqrt(Eps_eff))-2*deltaL... the autor calculate L'=L-2*deltaL, I mean that he took the initial value (40.1 mm)instead of 41.82 mm if you calculate with Eps_eff instead of Epsr !!
///Yes, you are right. The author used Epsr = 2.33 instead of Eps_eff=2.141 that would lead to 38.58 instead of 36.849~36.85 indicated by the author.\\\

Is that correct ??
///Yes, you are correct.\\\

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close