Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Missing Collector Straps!!

Missing Collector Straps!!

Missing Collector Straps!!

We have a light gauge bearing wall project in New Jersey (seismic Design Category B) with floor joists at 24" oc and 9/16" x 24 gauge decking with 1.5" light weight concrete topping.

We are the EOR, but the contractor hired a separate engineer to design the bearing walls for panelized shop construction that were shipped to the site. Everyone has agreed that the lateral system remains per our drawings. We assumed that the floor diaphragm carries lateral loads horizontally to the shearwall lines and various elements along those lines (wall top tracks, steel beams, ledgers etc) "collect" and deliver the loads to the individual shearwalls. In addition, we detailed continuous coil straps to ensure continuity at various transitions. Unfortunately the contractor (and special inspectors) missed the straps when they should have been installed!!

The panel engineer's position is that the floor deck likely has the strength and stiffness to act as both a diaphragm and a collector and, given the concrete topping, the most natural load path is for the diaphragm to deliver the lateral loads directly to the shearwalls without relying on the straps. As a result, they believe the focus should be on verifying the deck capacity followed by checking the local connections at the floor to shearwall transfer and not necessarily forcing the contractor to install the coil straps.

The (untopped)deck diaphragm shear capacity is 180 plf (ASD) which is higher than any of the shear wall loads from an individual level. So it appears at first glance that this approach may have merit?

RE: Missing Collector Straps!!

Quote (Martin O)

The (untopped)deck diaphragm shear capacity is 180 plf (ASD) which is higher than any of the shear wall loads from an individual level. So it appears at first glance that this approach may have merit?

Perhaps. And, frankly, throughout most of the history of structural engineering, this is probably exactly what would have been done with little to no explicit attention to collectors.

As you know, however, using modern analysis design techniques, it is very difficult to tell a complete story of diaphragm action this way while still sticking the normal assumption of your deck being a "shear panel" (only shear resistance, no in-plane axial/bending). Once you take away the explicit chords and collectors, you find yourself having to move loads around from their points of origins (masses, exterior walls etc) without ways to get that done that are either robust or readily quantifiable.

In a low seismic jurisdiction like New Jersey, I would be inclined to see if the "do nothing" approach can reasonably work. That said, I know next to nothing about your project and you certainly done want 1/2 of your building P-delta racking out into space because it was relying on a tension connection to the diaphragm/shear walls that was based on the capacity of an unreinforced concrete topping and metal deck side lap connections.

How tall is this building?

What's the nature of your shear wall system? I'd like this a lot better if it's CFM shear walls distributed all over the plan rather than trying to move everything back to an elevator shaft and a couple of stairwells.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Functional Prototyping Using Metal 3D Printing
Functional prototypes are a key step in product development – they give engineers a chance to test new ideas and designs while also revealing how the product will stand up to real-world use. And when it comes to functional prototypes, 3D printing is rewriting the rules of what’s possible. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close