×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

(OP)
I have started to develop a structural analysis tool (linear elastic response) using an alternative method to FEA, and I am wondering if the tool would be useful. The method uses a regular grid rather than a mesh. So it is less accurate for sharp shapes but seems to be very fast. Since I am not a structural engineer, I wanted to get thoughts on this to see if this kind of tool (coming from microstructure studies) could be helpful for the design process? For example, at a very early stage of a design, drawings could be done in a few seconds. Here is the tool I am working on: fsa.plvaldenaire.com

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

Very interesting. It reminds me of Simulia SimKraft application (it uses regular FEM though). I think that your code would fit mobile devices too. Can you say more about the theoretical basics of this method ? Is it based on some research paper ?

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

(OP)
This is based on this original method (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...) that I improved during my PhD.

It involves the same equations as the ones used by FEA (mechanical equilibrium and linear elasticity from continuous mechanics). The difference is from the numerical integration. Here, it uses Finite Difference rather than Finite Element/Volume so the fields (stress and strain tensors) are discretised on a regular grid. That leads to one drawback: shapes are 'aliased' but also one advantage: very fast and less memory usage. The quality of the result depends directly on the resolution of the grid. At high resolution it should give the same exact solution as FEA.

I usually use this method to predict microstructure stress concentration because microstructure models are often on grid (like from microscopy images).

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

how does a "grid" differ from a "mesh" ?

Finite Difference models have been around for a long time. I reviewed one on a recent project … wasn't that impressed with a 25 grid "FEM" but maybe I missed the point ?

One way to get good results without a superfine mesh is using the P method (where you increase the element order, instead of reducing it's size).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

(OP)
Discrete derivatives with FDM lead to a grid with nodes periodically spaced (see picture). A grid may not be as good at describing shapes as a mesh, but a grid has some advantages. For example, using Fourier Transform to solve equations in Fourier space, which is very fast (you don’t inverse a huge matrix, but simply multiply matrices).

The comparison of computation time between FDM and FEM is hard as most recent softwares (Solidworks, Catia) propose highly parallelized computation using GPU. FDM are not widely used so are less optimised. For instance, I just use one core. I did a comparison with a one core FEM simulation, and it seems to take the same order of time and less memory.

I was thinking that FDM is not supposed to replace FEM for Structural Analysis since it works really well. But FDM could have advantages for specific uses like from quick drawings and images that are on a grid.

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

if you're limited to square (rectangular?) spaces … then you're very limited ('cept buildings).

an "interesting" application of this may be is investigating a 1:1 mapping to a non-square space ?

but these days FEM computation time/cost is pretty negligible … probably more time/cost in preparing the model and interpreting the results.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

oooh... Schwarz-Christoffel transform!! I learned that in junior year math; the last time I tried to do something like that was about 1983 reading, but I wussed out and brute-force numerically cranked the solution.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

RE: Alternative method to FEA for Structural Analysis?

(OP)
You can draw any shape. It is only limited by the resolution. I have attached a screenshot showing shapes with curves.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close