×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Win TR-55 Question

Win TR-55 Question

Win TR-55 Question

(OP)
I am using Win TR55 to analyze a drainage area. The parameters are as follows:
Area 10.61 Ac,
Weighted CN 87
Tc 0.188 (hr) (100' Sheet flow at 2%, 662' at 28.4% unpaved, 208' at 2.16% Paved and 593 feet channel at 6.589 f/s.
This site is in the Caribbean and the rainfall type is II,
I have a PF Tabular Rainfall Data of:
5 min 0.847
10 1.16
15 1.49
30 2.38
60 3.53
2 HR 5.29
3 HR 6.04
6HR 8.94
12 HR 12.2
24 HR 15.6

When I analyzed the site in Win TR55 it returns a peak flow of 118.88 cfs.
That number seems to be off by about a factor of 2 based on an analysis of the site using the rational equation as a check with the 10 min intensity. Q=CIA, Q=0.87 x (1.16 in/10 min x6)x 10.61 acres Give me a Flow of 69.4
What am I missing?

RE: Win TR-55 Question

There are a multiple reasons I wouldn't expect a good match:

1) They're different runoff procedures. Rational is linear with respect to rainfall, SCS is not.

2) CN=87 does not necessarily equate to C=0.87

3) When you use a Type II rainfall and set the 24-hour depth, the 10-minute depth is effectively given by the Type II curve, and may not match the 10 minute depth you quoted. In fact, if I scale a 24-hour Type II rainfall to your 15.6 inches I'm seeing a 10-minute depth of about 2", vs your value of 1.16".

Item 3 alone would explain most of the difference.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net

RE: Win TR-55 Question

unless I am mistaken, it appears that you are using a 10 minute rainfall depth instead of intensity in the rational equation. I would expect your intensity to be much higher, resulting in higher runoff predicted from the rational method

RE: Win TR-55 Question

(OP)
cvg, The 6 in the rational calculation is to convert the rainfall depth to intensity. I am using an intensity of 6.96 inches per hour intensity of the storm.
The C value calculated for this area is .80 based upon the land use so that actually pushes the numbers further apart so that is not a contributing factor.

I did run the calculations by hand for TR-55 using the worksheets and I still found the numbers to be much closer to the rational numbers and not the Win TR-55 numbers. To do this I interpolated off of Exhibit 4-II to get a Qu number which is the only place where I can see any wiggle room on the calculations, but that should not be lead to at 58% changes in the peak flow.

RE: Win TR-55 Question

I think you'll find that the Type III distribution is a better match for your PF data than Type II.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close