Owners of condominiums are rarely made whole in a construction defect lawsuit. They usually settle out for somewhere between 50 and 75 percent of the value of the defect remediation if all items are corrected. Further, most states require disclosure of conditions a real estate transaction and that can be problematic for owners if the defects are not corrected.
Many attorneys are now taking these cases on a contingency. In my state, contingencies are capped at 40 percent for personal injury but there is no cap on a contingency for construction defects...it's whatever the lawyer can negotiate with the condo association. Most of them that I have seen are in the 20 to 30 percent range. We recently were involved in a defect case that had bids for remediation by competent contractors in the $10 million range. The association settled at mediation for about $9 million. The attorney took $2 million for contingency. They paid my firm several hundred thousand for the investigative work, depositions and litigation support. There were thousands of documents that had to be reviewed over a period of 5 years. All of that left the Association with about $6.5 million to accomplish a $10 million scope of work. We helped them prioritize the repairs to reduce the financial impact and were able to complete first tier necessities (life safety work is first, followed by solving water intrusion issues, then the "gloss" restoration and alleviating disclosure issues as money permits.
If the case goes to trial and the case is strong for the Association, they can come out of it with enough money to make all the repairs. As an example, we had a case that went to trial a couple of years ago. We did the investigation and I testified at the trial for several days about the construction defects. When all was said and done, the jury awarded the condo association almost $10 million. The defendant, a major national builder, appealed the decision and lost the appeal after a 2-1/2 year appeal battle all the way to the state supreme court. The association prevailed and the state ordered the defendant to pay up plus interest. They now have enough money to fix all 20 of the buildings.
The litigation can be complicated and often takes numerous twists and turns. It is long and drawn out, leaving many associations to lose their taste for litigation and fold for a lesser settlement amount.