Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Mass Element Moment of Inertia

Mass Element Moment of Inertia

Mass Element Moment of Inertia

Hi All,

I understand that we always use 1E-6 for the moment of inertia when using mass element but I wonder why using 1E-6 or not to calculate an exact value?

Secondly, is there any cases that we will use RBE2 to transfer the load? As in to simulate a non-deformable load distribution? Thank you!

RE: Mass Element Moment of Inertia

sure, calculate your specific MMI. I think the idea behind using 1e-6 is that the MMI of small components is insignificant compared to the MMI of the total structure.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Mass Element Moment of Inertia

oh, yes, I use an RBE2 for a structure I consider to be rigid, like the upper part on a console (when I'm modelling the lower 1/2).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Mass Element Moment of Inertia

Thanks rb1957!

If we are transferring a component weight to the structure, generally using rbe3 but I do see people using rbe2 for non-deformable behavior. I wonder under what circumstances we should use rbe2?

RE: Mass Element Moment of Inertia

an RBE2 models rigid structure, in my case the upper console is a pretty rigid structure, constraining the lower console (a pretty flexible structure) so that at the interface "plane surfaces remain plane" and the interface translates and rotates as one (rigid) structure. So I modelled the lower console and the upper console was an RBE2.

More typical is to use RBE3s to distribute load around the section, because you don't want to constrain your model.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close