Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

Is it possible for a tension oly member to fail because of the KL/r ratio ?

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

I don't think there is direct relationship. But remotely remember AISC suggests that KL/r for tension member shouldn't less than 300.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

A tension member will not fail because of its slenderness ratio but may flap about if the tension is alternately applied and released. An example of this is a cross braced frame where each diagonal member is designed to resist tension only; a change in direction of force on the frame causes a stressed member to be suddenly released while its companion becomes stressed.


RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

I don't think it's going to fail because of the L/r ratio explicitly, but it might fail because a tension member with a very high L/r ratio is going to be quite flexible and prone to vibrating and wobbling, possibly causing fatigue-related issues down the road (at least that's my understanding). I assume this is building-related, but for bridges AREMA and AASHTO both limit L/r for tension members to 200 or 240.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

No...a tension element cannot fail in compression
otherwise it would not be a tension element :)

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

No. Hence, cable elements.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

In addition to what BA mentioned, handling is an issue with extremely slender tension members. When L/r exceeds 300 (the suggested limit retired mentioned from AISC), it's more likely that the material will be damaged as it flops around like a wet noodle on the site.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

No limit on KL/r for cable members. But, AISC does suggest limiting the KL/r ration for rods, and single angles and such. I haven't looked this up lately. But, if member serves me correct, it's not because of a capacity issue, but that they tend to get easily damaged / kinked. Hence the recommendation (not rule) about KL/r < 300.

Also, I believe some iterations of RISA enforce this recommendation. Though it can be changed in Tools - Preferences / Application Settings.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

Thank you all, Really appreciated,
It seems that the member was failing due to the suggested value L/R exceeds 300 in STAAD and it turned to be that I can turn this check off in STAAD.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - PLM and ERP: Their Respective Roles in Modern Manufacturing
Leading manufacturers are aligning their people, processes, and tools from initial product ideation through to field service. They do so by providing access to product and enterprise data in the context of each person’s domain expertise. However, it can be complicated and costly to unite engineering with the factory and supply chain. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close