×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio
7

TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

(OP)
Is it possible for a tension oly member to fail because of the KL/r ratio ?

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

I don't think there is direct relationship. But remotely remember AISC suggests that KL/r for tension member shouldn't less than 300.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

A tension member will not fail because of its slenderness ratio but may flap about if the tension is alternately applied and released. An example of this is a cross braced frame where each diagonal member is designed to resist tension only; a change in direction of force on the frame causes a stressed member to be suddenly released while its companion becomes stressed.

BA

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

I don't think it's going to fail because of the L/r ratio explicitly, but it might fail because a tension member with a very high L/r ratio is going to be quite flexible and prone to vibrating and wobbling, possibly causing fatigue-related issues down the road (at least that's my understanding). I assume this is building-related, but for bridges AREMA and AASHTO both limit L/r for tension members to 200 or 240.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

No...a tension element cannot fail in compression
otherwise it would not be a tension element :)

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

No. Hence, cable elements.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

In addition to what BA mentioned, handling is an issue with extremely slender tension members. When L/r exceeds 300 (the suggested limit retired mentioned from AISC), it's more likely that the material will be damaged as it flops around like a wet noodle on the site.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

No limit on KL/r for cable members. But, AISC does suggest limiting the KL/r ration for rods, and single angles and such. I haven't looked this up lately. But, if member serves me correct, it's not because of a capacity issue, but that they tend to get easily damaged / kinked. Hence the recommendation (not rule) about KL/r < 300.

Also, I believe some iterations of RISA enforce this recommendation. Though it can be changed in Tools - Preferences / Application Settings.

RE: TEnsion only member and selenderness ratio

(OP)
Thank you all, Really appreciated,
It seems that the member was failing due to the suggested value L/R exceeds 300 in STAAD and it turned to be that I can turn this check off in STAAD.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close