T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
(OP)
On 316 stainless, is a higher ratio of Cr/Ni preferable in terms of welding? Or, a lower ratio (and so less chance of ferrite formation), is better?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Contact USThanks. We have received your request and will respond promptly. Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting Guidelines |
T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
|
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
Have a look.
Regards.
DHURJATI SEN
Kolkata, India
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
You need to provide more details to get some meaningful answers.
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
In my own experience of testing welds, ferrite number readings have been extremely consistent for 308 and 316 deposits, to the point where for a given welding process I can usually predict FN to ±2 points.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
That takes care of it.
In hygienic service where we see a lot of autougenous welding there is also a S control, 0.007-0.017% as I recall to improve weld fluidity.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
RE: T316 weldability vs Cr/Ni ratio