×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Hi all! When evaluating the earth

Hi all! When evaluating the earth

Hi all! When evaluating the earth

(OP)
Hi all!
When evaluating the earth pressure forces in a wall wich is supporting a cohesive soil, we use to consider the effective parameters (effective friction angle and effective cohesion). I've always done this in this way by inertia because I was taught to to that. (consider water table at top of the wall).
Link
Thinking about that , would not be logical to consider undraided parameters to calculate the presure forces? In other words, I dont know why to use effective parameters to calculate earth pressure in a saturated fine soils.

Thank you in advance!

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

Most retention systems incorporate some sort of drainage mechanism in order to reduce the magnitude of lateral force to be resisted - i.e., remove hydrostatic loads. Since the systems are largely assumed to be drained and drained strengths are usually lower than undrained strength (a little cohesion goes a long way), for retention systems designed for long-term service (usually years rather than months), drained strengths are used. Normally, I assume friction angles based on correlations with the plasticity index and zero cohesion.

This is for cut walls, obviously, since nobody in north america (where I work) should be specifying/allowing cohesive backfill - at least immediately behind the wall - for fill-type walls.

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

For most walls, but not all, that I design, drained conditions control. Check it both ways and use the more critical loading.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

slope stability should consider the lowest safety factor for the following:

drained
undrained
circular
non-circular

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

(OP)
The problem I've to solve is a diaphragm wall, is not the same as a cantilever earth retention wall wich have drains.
In a diaphragm wall water table is always going to be at the same height, and only 1 alternative (c,phi or c',phi') should be considered.
Please I would appreciate any aclaration about this issue.

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

Give us all the detail you possibly can. Your first post is too vague and your last post is just starting to give us some detail of your problem.

Do you have any subsurface data to share?
Is the wall permanent or temporary?
If temporary, What’s the duration that the wall will be exposed?
Will there be dewatering inside the excavation?
Ect.

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

Undrained conditions are related to no volumetric changes.

Drained conditions are related to no excess of pore water pressures.

As jdonville mentioned, since walls are always designed to have good drainage, soil drained parameters are used.

As PEinc and fattdad mentioned, you may need to check both undrained and drained conditions and use the most critical. But similar to slope stability analysis, once you start considering cohesion for undrained conditions, I would expect that your FOS may increase. So drained conditions normally controls.

For your wall, you should also add hydrostatic pressures for the entire height of the wall.

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

(OP)
Hi all!
1- Subsurface data:
-- a. 1m fill
-- b. 15m low plasticity clayley soil
-- c. 5m gravels
2- The wall is permanent (is a diaphragm wall made with a clambshell and poured with a tremie pipe). It's and cut and cover structure, maximum excavation depth is -8.00m.
3- Water table is at -3.00m.

My question is because the design software ask me only for one set of parameters, (c/phi, c'/phi' effective), and most people in the office use to calculate with effective parameters, with no arguments. My question is: ¿Why not calculate with undrained parameters too? It could be determinant...

Thank you all!

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

(OP)

I hope this picture let you know better my question.
For undrained condicions, most times people use to take c=qu/2 and phi=0

The reason of this post is that I would like to know why dont use undrained parameters.

Thank you all!

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

I would agree with PEinc, fattdad, and Okiryu, you should check both drained and undrained but as PEinc drained conditions typically control. I actually don't recall undrained controlling once but it's just prudent to check, especially if you're using software that can spit out the result in seconds.

RE: Hi all! When evaluating the earth

When soils are excavated, the retained soils will experience an increase in shear stress. This will result in excess pore water pressures and soils will be undrained temporarily. For clays, it will take some time for excess pore water pressure to dissipate but eventually they will dissipate and soils will be in drained conditions. If you are not sure if excess pore water pressures will be generated, you will need to check both undrained and drained conditions. As MTNClimber mentioned, you will be able to do this very quickly since you are using software. By the way, drainage does not mean drained conditions. However, good drainage helps to minimize excess pore water pressures so drained conditions can be used.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Simulation-Driven Design With SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now
eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close