×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Back-driven Gearbox and motor

Back-driven Gearbox and motor

Back-driven Gearbox and motor

(OP)
What kind of gearbox is best for being back-driven (driven in both directions - not sure if 'back-driven' is the exact term)? The driving torque would be quite small, to the point where the motor's rotor inertia needs to be taken into account. I wouldn't want a reduction ratio any greater than 20:1. I was informed that a cycloidal drive may be the way to go but I was hoping for a second opinion.

Thanks!

RE: Back-driven Gearbox and motor

PendGB,

Worm gears over 30:1 generally are not back-driveable. The problem is not the gear ratio. It is the worm's lead angle. As far as I know, most other drives are back-driveable, including harmonic drives. Talk to your gear/gearbox vendor, and/or read your machine design textbook.

The inertia of whatever is being driven is multiplied by the square of the gear ratio. For your 20:1 speed increaser, this means your driven inertia is multiplied by 400. That is a heck of a lot! An output shaft that does not budge will turn when you apply enough torque, perhaps with a wrench.

I worked with a system that had a 500:1 MicroMo gearmotor. I was unable to grab and rotate the output shaft. I was able to turn the scanner housing the shaft was attached to. I felt comfortable applying 100 lb.in of torque to the thing. I worked out the torque needed to accelerate the very tiny motor armature to its maximum allowable torque. This proved to be 40 lb.in. I asked, and I was told that gearmotors were breaking.

Do you have a mechanical engineer on site? This can be complicated.

--
JHG

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close