×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

2018 International Existing Building Code - Alterations

2018 International Existing Building Code - Alterations

2018 International Existing Building Code - Alterations

(OP)
For Prescriptive Compliance Method, “Exception” in section 503.4 allows a break for any existing lateral load carrying element whose demand-capacity ratio with the alteration considered is not more than 10% greater than its D/C ratio with the alteration ignored.
For Work Area Compliance Method, no such break is allowed for Level 3 Alterations in section 906.2.

I asked ICC for confirmation to see if that is indeed the intent. I was told the following:

902.1 indicates Level 3 alterations should comply with all the requirements of chapters 7 and 8 (Levels 1 and 2 alterations), which means the 10%-rule still applies. However, the “substantial structural alteration” language spelled out in 906.2, as defined in 202, would push the D/C ratio increase over 10% anyway, “no 10% break” was therefore not explicitly excluded in the code language.

I find this explanation dubious because “altering more than 30% of the gravity load-carrying elements supporting the total floor and roof area” as defined in 202 does not always increase the D/C ratio by more than 10% for the lateral load-carrying elements.

At any rate, it seems to me that 10%-rule does not apply for Level 3 alterations as it is not specifically brought up in section 906.2.

That said, for the same “alteration level 3” scope project, one can take the advantage of the 10% break if the Prescriptive Compliance Method is selected. But no such luxury if the Work Area Compliance Method is used instead. This seems counter-intuitive to me as I am under the impression that the more “detailed” Work Area Compliance Method would offer designers more leeway as an incentive. Looks like it’s the other way around here, at least for the lateral load-carrying elements.
I appreciate anyone’s thoughts on this one.

RE: 2018 International Existing Building Code - Alterations

I agreed the response from ICC was dubious.

I found in Florida existing building, one section was added from IEBC language:

[BS] 907.4.4 Limited structural alteration
Where the work does not involve a substantial structural alteration and the building is not assigned to Seismic Design Category F, the existing elements of the lateral load-resisting system shall comply with Section 807.5. (Alterations level 2, which has the 10% exception).

Based on that, my take was that alterations classified as “substantial structural alteration” cannot use the D/C ratio <10% rule, even that does not always increase the D/C ratio by > 10% (Agreed).

IEBC should clarify this. I am very interested to clarify this as well. Would you follow up with ICC to clarify and attach ICC's response here?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Manufacturing the Cars of Tomorrow
In this ebook, we'll explore how additive manufacturing is going to transform the way cars are made. This includes commentary from thought leaders such as Ford's CTO, Ken Washington, Customer case studies of ways 3D printing is being used today, and a variety of part examples where 3D printing is already impacting how automobiles are made. Download Now
White Paper - Smart Manufacturing for Semiconductor
New technologies and approaches present great opportunities for semiconductor manufacturers to achieve high levels of innovation, yield and improvement. This white paper explores some of these cutting-edge technologies and how they can be applied effectively in the semiconductor industry. Read about how Smart Manufacturing is transforming the semiconductor industry. Download Now
White Paper - Analysis and Simulation in Aircraft Structure Certification
Organizations using simulation and analysis tools effectively see the benefits in their ability to achieve certification faster and with drastically less total cost than those who do not maximize these tools. Read this White Paper to learn about how digital tools such as analysis and simulation help in aircraft structure certification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close