Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Plastic behavior

Plastic behavior

Plastic behavior

I'm analyzing a component that can be yield but cannot reach ultimate stress (AISI 4340). I initialize the elastic behavior with E and V and in the plastic section I put the yield stress and 0 plastic deformation and then the ultimate stress with the relative plastic deformation. Now the model stopped converging and I cannot think of anything to fix it

RE: Plastic behavior

Apparently your model was on the edge of nonconvergence before you added plasticity. But it’s rather unusual that including plastic behavior makes things worse (usually it’s the opposite). Did you get any warnings regarding plasticity calculations from Abaqus ? Are you sure that units are correct ? Try adding more stress-strain pairs to the plasticity definition. That’s because when load goes beyond the end of defined curve then Abaqus extrapolates the curve with horizontal line (perfect plasticity) and convergence issues may occur. Also reduce initial time increment and consider using stabilization.

RE: Plastic behavior

I think the non-convergence was not related to the plasticity effect but to the change of other boundary conditions.

On a side note: I want to be sure I implement the "plasticity" effect in the right way. I'm using AISI 4130 and I found in matweb that yield strength is 65,000 psi and ultimate is 95,000 ksi. Elogantion at break is 25% so when I implement these data in ABAQUS through Plasticity tab, shall I put 0 deformation at 65,000 psi and 0.25 at 95,000 psi?

RE: Plastic behavior

Yes, that’s correct. Of course you always have to be careful with units and if you use data from mechanical tests remember that you must input true stress-strain values (not nominal).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Evolving Landscape of Commercial Battery-Powered Trucks
What’s driving the evolving landscape of truck electrification? What are the barriers, motivators and strategies for accelerating the electric transition? What insights and resources are available for today’s design engineers working to achieve industry disruption and evolution? For answers to these and other pertinent questions, read this white paper. Download Now
eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close