×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Heat Exchanger Tubes Thickness under external pressure & ASME Section VIII 1968 versus latest ed

Heat Exchanger Tubes Thickness under external pressure & ASME Section VIII 1968 versus latest ed

Heat Exchanger Tubes Thickness under external pressure & ASME Section VIII 1968 versus latest ed

(OP)
Dear All,


Back-ground:
Heat Exchanger with SB-111 UNS 71500 HR50(3/4", 9 BWG - 3.7 mm) designed on ASME Section VIII 1968 Edition and installed in 1977. Now we plan to replace with the same design conditions, material and design code ASME Section VIII Div. 1. The manufacturers have told that the tubes thickness IS NOT ADEQAUTE UNDER EXTERNAL PRESSURE as per latest ASME code and proposed 4.7 mm thick tubes. Old calculations from original manufacturer are not available.

I am not sure why it is failing. Change in thickness will impact thermal performance and other installation issues. I need your expert advise on the following issue:
1) What are the changes in ASME Code calculations from 1968 to latest edition?
2) What are the changes in Code allowable stress values?
3) When checked the tubes thickness on ASME Section VIII Div 1 & Code Case 2286. Tubes thickness is okay but there is a limitation for using code case i.e., it is limited to ~ 65 Deg C for copper and copper alloys. Our design temperature for shell and tube side is 210 Deg C and 50 Deg C respectively. Can we use Code Case considering Mean metal temperature of the tubes which is less than 65 Deg C instead of shell side design temperature?

Requesting urgent replies.

Regards,

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes Thickness under external pressure & ASME Section VIII 1968 versus latest ed

Can you post pictures of the tube failures ?

Do the failures show the characteristic "external crushing" mechanism type of external pressure failure ?

What was the corroded remaining wall thickness of the tubes when you tested them ??

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes Thickness under external pressure & ASME Section VIII 1968 versus latest ed

(OP)
There have been no failures due to external crushing / pressure. Failures were due to long service of around 40+ years & some tubes are plugged only.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close