Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

Hello Forum,

I am dealing with structure made up of square HSS. I have few queries regarding design of pin / shear connection.
Please find the attached image of 2 options of shear connection.
In option 1, how to determine the thickness te? SCI recommend to use min thickness required to distribute loads from fin plate to welds surrounding beam web in ratio of 2.5 to 1, which is very high in my opinion. For e.g., of I have 150 wide square HSS beam, this means the thickness te has to be (150/2)/2.5 = 30 mm, which is too high irrespective of the forces to be transferred to through it. Correct me if I am wrong & suggest alternative method for determinating te.
In option 2 we have extended the plate inside the sq. HSS beam up to depth d. How to evaluate this depth? Any suggestion will be very helpful.


RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

Is that a beam to girder connection or a beam to column connection? If beam to column, I would suggest rotating the plates 90 degrees. In either case, take a look at AISC Design Guide 24. It should answer most of your questions.

EDIT: Sorry - didn't read the title closely enough.

RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

For Option 1) If I remember correctly, the 2.5:1 dispersion ratio was for axially loaded HSS braces/members. If you have a basic shear connection, I'd base the thickness on the required weld size of the stem plate bolted to the shear tab. If you're loading the HSS cap plate in shear, it's going to have more weld to the hss, and be quite stiff at the hss walls. Plate flexure within the HSS perimeter shouldn't be an issue.

For Option 2) Make the "d" dimension greater than or equal to the depth of your HSS member. It can be larger depending on what welds you need to transfer the shear force.

RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

Don't underestimate the effect of the eccentricity of the connection. As observed by quite a few in this forum it seems to be rife amongst many engineers to ignore this. You need 'excessively' thick plates to avoid plate buckling. (Or you could use non gussets or non eccentric connections.)

Here is some research on this matter:

RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

I don't believe the end plate te is more critical than the wall thickness of the supporting beam. Of the two options proposed, I prefer Option 1 but the supporting beam must be designed for torsion and its wall may need reinforcing at the connection. The end plate thickness and wall reinforcing can be determined using yield line analysis.

Perhaps a better detail would be an angle at the end of the supported beam with horizontal leg lapping over the supporting beam.


RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

DrZ and human909 are correct. The thick plate thickness is undoubtedly for a compression strut. If it is a beam as your title suggests, not so thick.

RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

This is the connection I was thinking of:

It's not a perfect pin but it has less eccentricity than the proposed connection and it does not overstress the wall of the supporting HSS beam in local bending.


RE: Square HSS beam to Sq. HSS beam pin / shear connections

Dear All,

Thank you very much for your response.
Yes the 2.5:1 ratio is for bracings. AISC Design Guide 24 (DG24) also have same ratio.
Thank you @ phamENG, for telling the DG24, a complete reference for hollow section connections, really good document.
Thank you Dr, human909 & hokie66 for your comments. I was also worried about the eccentricity.
BAretirec I really appreciate your efforts, thank you. I am looking forward to use your recommendation i.e., end plate welded to supported beam which will be bolted to thick tapped plate (having higher thread shear resistance than mating bolt) welded on supporting beam. This will have very little eccentricity on supporting beam.
Thank you once again for your help.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close