Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Geometric orientation of holes on round part?

Geometric orientation of holes on round part?

Geometric orientation of holes on round part?

Is this the correct way to position a four-hole pattern to a single hole and tie them together radially on the face of a round part were a center hole (B) and the face (a) are the only datums. Our discussion is over the clarity as drawn.

Center lines are shown perpendicular with the single hole at the 270 degree position, one of the holes from the four hole pattern is shown being 45 degrees off the 0 degree line with the 4 x 90 degrees shown to the next hole at the 135 degree position.  Both the four-hole pattern and the single hole have separate positional call outs to the face datum A and the hole datum B.

Does this automatically tie the holes to each other?
Would it be better to make either the four-hole pattern or the single hole a datum and position the other to it?

Thanks for your help.

RE: Geometric orientation of holes on round part?

According to ASME Y14.5M-1994, the single hole and the four-hole pattern you described (5 holes total) are considered to be a simultaneous requirement if the feature control frames for each callout references the same datums, in the same order of precedence, and uses the same material condition modifier for the datum feature of size (datum B in your example).  This is stated in the standard at two locations as follows:

"4.5.12 Simultaneous Requirements. Where two or more features or patterns of features are located by basic dimensions related to common datum features referenced in the same order of precedence and at the same material condition, as applicable, they are considered a composite pattern with the geometric tolerances applied simultaneously as illustrated by Fig. 4-26. If such interrelationship is not required, a notation such as SEP REQT is placed adjacent to each applicable feature control frame. See para., and Fig. 5-18."

This concept is also described in the positional tolerance section(Section 5)as follows:

" Simultaneous Requirement - MMC.  Where any of the common datums in multiple patterns of features is specified on an MMC basis, there is an option whether the patterns are to be considered as a single pattern or as having separate requirements. If no note is added under the feature control frames, the patterns are to be treated as a single pattern. Where it is desired to permit the patterns to be treated as separate patterns, a notation such as SEP REQT is placed beneath each feature control frame. See Fig. 5-18. This allows the datum features of size to establish a separate datum reference frame for each pattern of features, as a group. These datum reference frames may shift independently of each other, resulting in an independent relationship between the patterns. This principle does not apply to the lower segments of composite feature control frames except as noted in para."

Based on the above conventions, the 5 holes you described are verified as a single pattern.

Hope this helps


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close