Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


degree of consolidation vs thickness

degree of consolidation vs thickness

degree of consolidation vs thickness


I have been talking with a colleague about consolidation settlement for an specific clay (Normally consolidated and one way drainage). Such clay is 10 ft thick, will have 20 inches EOP settlement and will settle 4 inches in 6 months, he understands that the same clay layer having a thickness of 30 ft will settle the same 4 inches in 6 months (such as thickness does not affect the degree of consolidation).

Eventhough he did not show any numbers, I decided to run my own numbers and i got a different settlement time:

Original clay: U= 4/20 = 0.25 -> T = 0.049, from t = H2 x T / cv -> cv = (10)^2 x 0.049 / 4 months = 1.225 ft2 / months

Using cv for the 30 ft clay layer:

t = H2 x T / cv -> t = 30^2 x 0.049 / 1.225 ft2 / months = 36 months

Does my approach make sense?. My approach shows that for the same clay but with different thicknesses, the same settlement value (4 inches) will take longer to reach for the thickest layer.

anyone has any thoughts about this?

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness

On this subject in my experience trying to predict settlement times only one case had the field measurements coincide roughly with the predictions. In the sampling sometimes sand seams are missed and one thinks his layers are thick but they are sometimes much less than info may say..

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness

Still, it doesn't make sense to me that the same clay but with different thicknesses is going to have the time of consolidation, for example to reach 40% consolidation.

Per the formula t = T x H2 / cv -> if thickness increases, time increases as well.

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness

U = 4/20 = 0.2 not 0.25, so your Tv would change slightly.

If you want to calculate how long it would take for the 30ft thick clay layer to settle 4 inches, you need to know the total settlement (or EOP settlement) for that layer. If it has the same properties of the 10ft thick clay layer then it would settle more than 20 inches. Let’s assume it will settle 30 inches. Now if you want to calculate time rate to achieve 4 inches of settlement, U = 4/30 = 0.13 which gives you a different time factor (Tv). If you wanted to know how long it would take to achieve the same percent consolidation, say 40%, then your Tv would stay the same.

By looking at the formula, t = (H^2xTv)/cv, it is apparent that time is directly proportional to the thickness of the clay layer. If thickness (H) increases, time increases.

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness


good catch.

I agree, thanks.

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness

If the Cv is very low, and 6 months settlement is still within 60% (DOC<60%), similar settlement is expected at both sites. Otherwise 9m thick clay will settles more than 3m thick clay. Refer to Duncan's 1993 Terzaghi Lecture on limitations of conventional consolidation theory.

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness

The total settlement will increase if the compressible layer increases but the time for the same first 4 inches of settlement to occur will be the same regardless the thickness of the compressible layer.

RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness


Thanks for your response. Would you able to prove your point based on the typical Time factor and H formulas given related to consolidation?. Per the typical formulas I used, I prove that the thicker the layer the longer it takes to reach 4 inches of settlement.


RE: degree of consolidation vs thickness

pelelo, I am based on the chart of pore pressure distribution thru depth and time factor (z/H vs. U%). Basically, that chart does not change even if the thickness of the layer changes. (I just recalled this was a question in the CA GE exam...)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper – Data Security and Know-How Protection
Our data is constantly exposed to the danger of being intercepted or stolen as it wends its way over global data networks. Data security measures and measures for protecting intellectual property should not, however, first be implemented when data is exchanged – companies must lay the foundation for these measures within their own organization. Download Now
White Paper – Collaboration in the PLM Context
The influence exerted by the Internet of Things (IoT) means that there is a steadily growing need for collaboration in industry. Partners from new industries and areas of application need to be integrated in cross-company business processes to ensure that the lifecycle of smart, connected products can be managed from end to end. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close