Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

I would not use BARs (beams) but three rods, in the orthogonal directions (X, Y, Z), at each point.

Stiffness (Area of the rod) … I use anything from 0.1in2 to 1in2 (1in2, 1in long, AL, gives stiffness of 1E7 … pretty typical).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

@rb1957 (Aerospace).. Thank you for your reply. its highly appreciated. How would it differ if BARS were used instead of rods, and secondly, in FEMAP, I get an option to use standard or the NASTRAN element, any explanation wud be helpful? Thank you.

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

RODs allow only axial load, BEAMs allow transverse shear.

My usual approach is "lazy" … three RODs and fully constrain the unconnected nodes.
Yes, I could constrain just the axial freedom.

If you use BEAMs then constrain only the axial freedom (may have been obvious to you).
If you use BEAMs and constrain all translation freedoms then you allow transverse shear and your reactions are no longer orthogonal and "wrong".
If you use BEAMs and fix the ends (constrain all 6 dof) your results are definitely Wrong.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

Hi, Could you please let me know the steps on how to attach these rod elements to the feet as in my file?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements


you have a node at the foot of your structure, (X,Y,Z)

create 3 nodes off-set by 1 in each direction, (X+1,Y,Z), (X,Y+1,Z), (X,Y,Z+1)

connect these three nodes to the foot node, with RODs, area = 1 (or 10 or 0.1), material = Al

constrain the three new nodes in translation (X,Y,Z). Using RODs you can constrain in all 6 dof. If you use beams (because you want to fix the foot), then constrain in only 3 dof.

each ROD will react load in one direction = pinned support with finite stiffness.

check displacement of foot node, should be "small".

check effect of changing ROD stiffness (area), should be "small".

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

If I constrain 3 dofs when using the beam, it causes transverse shear, but then in the last few lines of your comment, you mentioned that I can use beams and constrain 3 dof. How can this validate correct reactions?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements


the node you want to restrain is 0 (X, Y, Z).

create three nodes …
1 (X+1, Y, Z)
2 (X, Y+1, Z)
3 (X, Y, X+1)

create three RODs …
0-1, 0-2, 0-3
Area either 1 or 0.1 in2, Al ( E = 1E7)

Constrain nodes 1,2,3 in X, Y, Z (redundant, but easy)

each ROD reacts load in one of the global axes.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

So, the O node is the origin node (0,0,0)? In total there should be 12 nodes?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

nope …
"0" is the node you want to constrain, presumably 4 of them ?
yeap …
12 additional nodes

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

you have four nodes …
1 on the structure
and 2,3,4 are offset in the three directions.

so RODs are N1-N2, N1-N3, N1-N4.
area = 1in2 (or 0.1in2) … try and see the difference
material Al, E = 10E6psi

add nodal constraint (pinned) to N2, 3, 4.

if this is not clear, read the manual, do the tutorials, watch the YT videos.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

yes,this is very clear. I did it and constrained N2,3,4 as full fixity. Secondly, the three nodes at each feet were plotted as you suggested (x+1,y,z),(x,y+1,z),(x,y,z+1). Can I plot as (x+5,y,z) or +1 is the standard?

RE: Bar 2 or Bar 3 elements

+1 or +5 not much difference … +5 will be a "softer" constraint (stiffness = AE/L)

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Solutions Brief - Protecting and Rescuing On-Ground Personnel
Keeping our warfighters safe and delivering them a competitive advantage is a key goal of departments of defense around the world. It’s a goal shared by embedded computing manufacturers like Abaco: we never forget who we serve.This case study describes how a major international contractor integrated an Abaco single board computer at the heart of its CAS/CSAR solution. Download Now
Datasheet - Top Enhancements Creo 7.0
PTC's Creo 7.0 has breakthrough innovations in the areas of generative design, real-time simulation, multibody design, additive manufacturing, and more! With Creo 7.0, you will be able to design the most innovative products faster than ever before, keeping you on the cutting edge of product design and ahead of your competition. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close