×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Diffusion and heat transfer analysis - Fick's and Fourier's equations comparison

Diffusion and heat transfer analysis - Fick's and Fourier's equations comparison

Diffusion and heat transfer analysis - Fick's and Fourier's equations comparison

(OP)
Dear fellow researchers,

I am having problems in a Abaqus standard diffusion analysis - water vapour transfer in wooden elements. I ran different analyses:
- mass diffusion analysis of water vapour transfer in wood (using material with defined diffusion coefficients and solubility and surface concentration flux for moisture "load", Fick's law was used for diffusion)
- heat tranfer analysis, using Fourier equations.

Fourier's equations (25) for heat transfer and Fick's equations (24) for mass diffusion are mathematically analogous.

With the help of research in [1], I set the material characteristics for heat transfer in mass diffusion model, the load was in both cases applied as a factorized relative humidity for 2 years time (cycles of drying and wetting of wood, however the point was just to get the same response with Fourier's and Fick's equations).

The response I got in one point is not the same. Although i got the same range of values (__* 10^-10), the difference factor between both values is around 1.5.
Does anybody got any idea, what else could be wrong? I thank you all for the answers.

With kind regards, Uros



[1] Stefania Fortino, Florian Mirianon, Tomi Toratti: A 3D moisture-stress FEM analysis for time dependent problems in timber structures.





where ρ, cT and T are the density, the specific heat and the temperature of wood, respectively,
while λ represents the second-order thermal conductivity tensor. The analogy between
(23) and (25) is obtained by posing cT = 1 and λ = ρD.



RE: Diffusion and heat transfer analysis - Fick's and Fourier's equations comparison

Even with forced equivalence of governing differential equations, procedures used in Abaqus for these two analysis step types (mass transfer and heat transfer) may not be the same. Take a look at the article titled „On shape stability of panel paintings exposed to humidity variations - Part 1: Modelling isothermal moisture movement” by S. Reijnen et al. Authors compare the two approaches and highlight the differences.

I would start from a very simple single elements test and proceed to full model only when good agreement between the results is obtained.

RE: Diffusion and heat transfer analysis - Fick's and Fourier's equations comparison

(OP)
FEA way, thank your for the useful article and information.

There are of course differences between both analysis types, Reijnen wrote it best:
"Heat transfer analysis based on Fourier's law can only use temperature gradient as the driving force behind the diffusive process. Driving forces like pressure, temperature and concentration can control the diffusive process. Consequently, there has to be translated to a temperature gradient."

I believe I found the right parameters, that connect both types of analysis:
In Fourier's equations, both density and specific heat of wood were set to 1 (it is the product that matters), the same values were used for diffusion coefficients and conductivity (heat transfer) coefficients and for surface flux (concentration or heat). In the attachement, results are shown, where the same response was obtained for concentration evolution through time (t). Basically, concentration and temperature field was compared in the analysis.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - The Evolving Landscape of Commercial Battery-Powered Trucks
What’s driving the evolving landscape of truck electrification? What are the barriers, motivators and strategies for accelerating the electric transition? What insights and resources are available for today’s design engineers working to achieve industry disruption and evolution? For answers to these and other pertinent questions, read this white paper. Download Now
eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close