Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

High density between contact

High density between contact

High density between contact

Good day ,

May I ask, how actually to obtain high density between contact of two surfaces of deformable bodies?

Thank you.

RE: High density between contact

I'm not sure what you mean. Could you give more details ? Are you talking about mesh density in the contact area ? If yes then you have to create partition and use local seeding to change mesh density in selected region.

RE: High density between contact

Hi FEA way,

I am very sorry for late reply.

Actually I want to model a compaction of bilayer iron powder. Iron powder itself I model it using solid, deformable bodies as per attached (Figure 1) with 0.5 Quad-mesh.

But I did not get as I done on my experimental image (result of final compaction of bilayer). I found that highest density happened at the interface located at the line between upper and lower layer of powder (as in Figure 2).

Therefore, I currently use ABAQUS/Explicit. May I know how to get the red effect at the middle region between upper and lower layer of modeling?
Thank you

RE: High density between contact

Maybe it’s because I’m reading this on my phone but I can’t see the second image with results (only Figure 1). Are you sure it’s attached ?

Also please give more details about the analysis setup (especially boundary conditions and loads but also material models and such). With this information it will be much easier to help you achieve expected result.

RE: High density between contact

Good day FEA way,

Currently, i am modeling an axisymmetric bilayer compaction which consists of 5 parts:

die, lower layer of powder, upper layer of powder, upper punch and lower punch.

Part Module - Both upper and lower layers are same in dimension. where the diameter is 10mm, and height is 10 mm. (as referring in Figure 1)

Property Module - I am applying elastic and Cap Plasticity (with the use of USDFLD subroutine)

Assembly Module - Model are assembled as in Figure 1 in axisymmetric form
Step Module - There are total of six steps all together so that, the steps can be similar as done in compaction experiment. The
first layer is compact first, and the upper punch raise and consequently, compact the upper layer, thus finally
form a solid bilayer tablet

Interaction module - all simulated as surface-based interaction.
Between bottom punch and lower layer is defined under surface-to-surface interaction
Between die wall and right side of lower layer is defined under surface-to-surface interaction
Between die wall and right side of upper layer is defined under surface-to-surface interaction
Between upper punch and top side of upper layer is defined under surface-to-surface interaction
Between upper punch and top side of lower layer is defined under surface-to-surface interaction
For modeling the interface between two layers (between top side of lower layer and bottom side of upper layer) is
defined under surface-to-surface interaction. All of the above mentioned interaction have applying penalty of friction
coefficient of 0.3
.....in order to get effect of higher density as obtained in experimental image of Figure 2.

Load Module - So far, i am using the punch displacement (Boundary Condition) to deform these two layers of deformable bodies.

Mesh Module - Mesh is in Quad-shape with size of 0.5 for both layers

However, in my case, i did not get the red effect as similar in my experiment.

Thank you FEA way for your kind help.

RE: High density between contact

Ok, now the goal and setup of the analysis is clear. However to determine what causes the difference between results from experiment and those from simulation I would have to take a look at the relative density plot that you generated from the analysis. Boundary conditions seem valid. However you should make sure that material model is correct. Especially that it is implemented via user subroutine. Also check contact properties. Especially friction behavior may play important role in this case. Maybe it should be adjusted to match experiment.

Do you use some particular scientific article as a reference ?

RE: High density between contact

Good day FEA way, bigsmile

So far, i did not have any plotting graph of relative density between experimental and modeling. I am just compare based on the image that i had been obtained.

I am always refer to a thesis written by Hossein Kashani Zadeh (2010) for material properties of iron. The iron powder has its own formulation (Brewin equation) to generate its material property (elastic and Cap Plasticity) along its increasing relative density between range of 0.5 to 1.0 (or 3.5 g/cm^3 to 7.0 g/cm^3) during compaction.

However, no any paper that build the bilayer compaction model based on Finite element (FE) but they always used particle method.

The attach given is the thesis by Zadeh

Actually, i am stuck on this modeling for long time and i do not have reference, FEA way thank you for your kind feedback

RE: High density between contact

Good day FEA way,

This is a graph from ABAQUS/Explicit analysis of relative density plot from upper and lower layers against displacement.

We can observe that the lower layer is more dense compare to upper layer of bilayer tablet at the end of compaction stage.

In my case, the plot of relative density from experimental compaction can only be done in form of contour.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Addressing Tooling and Casting Requirements at the Design Stage
Several of the tooling and casting requirements of a part can be addressed at the design stage. If these requirements are not addressed at the design stage, lot of time is spent in design iteration when the design reaches the die caster. These design issues lead to increase in time and cost of production leading to delay in time to market and reduced profits for the organization. Download Now
White Paper - The Other Side of Design for Assembly
Assembly level constraints need to be satisfied before the design can move downstream. This white paper will go through the various assembly level issues, which need to be tackled by various organizations on a regular basis. Know more about DFMPro, a design for assembly software. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close