Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Cross Section in Geometry Nonlinear Analysis

Cross Section in Geometry Nonlinear Analysis

Cross Section in Geometry Nonlinear Analysis

Dear All
Can you explain this section (Red Circle) in attachment file ?
Thank you

RE: Cross Section in Geometry Nonlinear Analysis

When you model your structure and get forces on your members, those forces are a result of your assumed member stiffnesses.

You then design your members to resist those forces.

Sometimes those designs result in LARGER or SMALLER members than what you originally modeled.

This means that your actual structure is different than the one you modeled.

ACI is simply saying that if the difference between your modeled structure and your actual designed/specified members are more than 10% different, you
should re-model the structure with these different member sizes. This will result in different member forces and you can then re-design to the more
correct forces.

Theoretically you'd keep repeating this process until the model members and the final member sizes were within 10% of each other.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Cross Section in Geometry Nonlinear Analysis

It basically means that if your documentation (the size you want built) differed by more than 10% in the properties noted from that which was analysed, then you should be updating the analysis to the correct sizes.

I believe its meant to allow for some minor tweaking of member properties, say rationalising say concrete member sizes to the nearest 1/2" rather than 1/4" which analysis might have been based on. Make too many changes, or larger changes then you are obliged to revisit the analysis with these updates included.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close