×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

modal parameter estimation

modal parameter estimation

modal parameter estimation

(OP)
Hello Everyone,

When using the poly-reference least squares complex frequency domain estimator (p-LSCF) to estimate modal parameters, you iteratively increase the model order and plot successive pole estimates on a stability diagram. In the literature it says you can only increase the model order in steps of Ni (number of inputs). Does anyone know why that is true?

For example:

RMFD - Right Matrix Fraction Description.




Is there a better place to post this question?

Regards,

RE: modal parameter estimation

You are in the right forum. I'd guess it has to do with how the matrix of results is laid out, and optimised. As disadvantages go it is a pretty trivial one. I've only used polyref a few times, decades ago, so I'm not at all familiar with its ins and outs. Real modal data from a full vehicle, which is what I tended to do, is so scrappy that we didn't waste much time on the niceties of analysis.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: modal parameter estimation

(OP)
Thanks Greg,

You can construct the stability diagram by summing all outputs over all references. Or, you can sum over all outputs grouped by all references.

For example the former (sum over all outputs over all references):

The upper limit of the sum is NoNi (# of outputs, # of references)



The T, S, R matrices are combinations of matrices X and Y (X is a shape function, Y is FRF data)





For example the latter (sum over all outputs):

The upper limit of the sum is No (# of outputs)



However, the Y matrix is different in this case (kronecker product)



The Ho matrix has dimensions 1 x Ni (# of references)


Back to the original post and this long winded reply, I believe, as you have said, the dimensions of the matrices in the latter example, are a function of the number of references, the formal example they are not.




Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - A Guide to 3D Printing Materials
When it comes to using an FDM 3D printer effectively and efficiently, choosing the right material at the right time is essential. This 3D Printing Materials Guide will help give you and your team a basic understanding of some FDM 3D printing polymers and composites, their strengths and weaknesses, and when to use them. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close