Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

one way slabs cast mono w/ beams

one way slabs cast mono w/ beams

one way slabs cast mono w/ beams

Hi all,
Second image shows a beam supporting a slab, which then shares the intersecting portion with the beam. I am curious if any of you check the interaction stresses when designing something like this. The only thing that resembles an answer that I found in ACI is in R7.6.4.2 (which relates to post tensioned/prestressed slabs) which calls for generating 100psi min compressive stresses across the intersection (roughly). Is there a way to replicate this with a standard CIP slab? Do I need to check my shear friction? All thoughts welcome. EDIT: title spelling error

RE: one way slabs cast mono w/ beams

- The detail to the right is typcial and what I would do.

- If, by interaction stresses, you mean bi-axial compression in the concrete, then, no, nobody checks that. It's probably beneficial by way of confinement etc anyways.

- Technically you should check shear friction. That said, with the right side detail and small diameter stirrups, I no longer bother. Two reasons for that:

1) I've checked a few and, baring unusual loading situations, it's never a problem.
2) You can count the same stirrups for shear and shear friction. In this sense, the problem nearly becomes self satisfying.
3) I've seen some literature on two pour bridge girders that suggests that you're probably fine for interface shear even with no stirrups at all crossing.

RE: one way slabs cast mono w/ beams

The first image shows the top bars depressed below the slab which is not correct for a Tee Beam. The second image shows a Tee Beam with top bars near the top where they should be. No special check is made for stress across the intersection.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close