×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

(OP)
Hi All,

Customer specified 3.2 material certification for pump lifting points. Is it possible to provide 3.2 material certification for lifting points. Please advise us.

RE: Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

Can you elaborate more about the question?
And, is this related to the pump question, and may be suitable and move the posting to the "Pump Forum"?

RE: Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

(OP)
Hi mk3223,

It is related to material certification on lifting points of all equipment ( like pressure vessel, pump, valve and etc.) Please advice.

RE: Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

In short, the material certificate must be certified by a third party inspector (TUV, Lloyd's,...). The 3.1 certificate issued by the manufacturer is not valid.

RE: Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

I would clarify whether the client is expecting a 3.2 type certifcate for the integrity and strength of the actual lifting part (hook, eye etc.). In other words, a third party inspection certificate against the design and test of a parts ability to withstand a certain mass. A material certificate will be required as well as documentation/test& procedure, to demonstrate the parts integrity. 3.1/3.2 certificates are not just for materials.

Per ISO, only the term Safety Valve is used regardless of application or design.

RE: Hi All, Customer specified 3.2 m

(OP)
Dear MGZmechanical & avalveman,

Thanks for the response.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close