×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

(OP)
Hello

We have a vessel on ammonical water service as per ASME SECTION VIII DIV 1.
It was imploded due to vacuum. And was restored due to mechanical jacks and pneumatic pressure.
It was derated after FFS level 3 assessment.the study included details of all the welded patches in analysis.

My question is that now we are planning to install platform structure on that platform. For that we need to install few welded patches on external surface.

Its a cladded vessel with CS oitside and SS inside.

In past we have observed cladding detachment in vessel owing to imploded incident.

What hazards are anticipated in welding or installation of structure on vessel.

External thickness and DYE PENETRANT TESTING of surface is satisfactory.


Does it unvalidate The ffs study fea analysis. Or should we check after welding from inside.


Or am i thinking more.

Best regards
Hassan

RE: Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

This would invalidate the FFS work. The Level 3 assessment would need to be re-performed with the modifications.

RE: Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

Discard this pressure vessel. Fabrícate new pressure vessel with external design pressure.

Regards.

RE: Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

(OP)
r6155: Cost matters. Thanks for the reply.

However, how far a modification can be considered a modification. We are welding the vessels with 10 each external pads for installing the platform. Comparing the size of vessel it is minimum.

RE: Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

i believe most engineers would agree with r6155 ...... The vessel is not repairable and must be replaced.

What happened to the vacuum relief device that was supposed to be on the vessel ?

Since your operations group is "out of control" do you plan on installing a new vacuum relief device on the reworked tank ?

Do you have pictures to share of the damage ? Can you share them ?


Regarding Codes, rules and FFS guidelines, .... I believe that you are in uncharted territory

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

RE: Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

If your plant can't see the benefit of replacing an imploded vessel versus hammering it out...

Personally I would never have faith in that vessel.

RE: Modification on derated vessel. FFS Level 3.

I agree with the others; scrap the vessel.

Further, I do not believe a legitimate FFS evaluation can be performed on a vessel in the condition you describe, even if the vessel was not clad.
I agree with MJCronin: you are in uncharted territory.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close