×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

(OP)
If designing a vessel or piping under the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) using EN13445 or EN13480, requirements for material certification (3.1, 3.2, 2.1 or 2.2) are given in EN764-5. In EN764-5 is a flow chart which defines the requirements for "main pressure-bearing parts" and "pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing". Can anyone give an example of a "pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing"? I've read PED guidelines 7/5, 7/6, 7/8 and 7/15 but there is not much specific information in there. My guesses of what "pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing" might be:
  • Bolting, apart from where failure of a single bolt cannot be tolerated? For example flange bolting would be 2.2 cert; Any specialised design where the bolting is not redundant, eg a quick acting closure held shut with a single threaded fastener (horrible design, sounds like an industrial accident waiting to happen, but given for an example here) would be 3.1 cert.
  • Weld consumables?
  • Stays, gussets and stiffeners used for shell strength?
  • Others?
Does anyone have any experience with this?

RE: Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

This thread may provide some leads; https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=450446
Other than that, I hvent foudn NoBo's to be so exact or determinate on this subject. However, 3.1 has become a standard, in that it is often supplied free or with little extra charge. As such, what I usually see is that a 3.1 CMTR is supplied regardless if the PED or EN764-5 requires 3.1 or not.

RE: Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

I may be able to help you even though I am not familiar with the documents that you listed. I believe that the term "pressure bearing parts" is a term synonymous to bearing stress, a topic that you'll find in strength of material and machine design text books. The stress in those text books is calculated by dividing the force on a part divided by the cross sectional area of that part to which you want to determine the stress. Basically it is a contact stress.

RE: Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

Im pretty sure this is not what OP meant. This matter deals with a topic of the PED that often leads to confusion. Do you have experience with the PED, chicopee?

RE: Pressure-bearing parts other than main pressure-bearing in the Pressure Equipment Directive

(OP)
Thanks @XL83NL. I've read that post and a couple of similar ones but it's not really giving me the clarity I was looking for. I'm really struggling to decide really if there are any parts, "main pressure-bearing" or "other than main-pressure bearing" where there is no need to get a 3.1 cert. As you mention. 3.1 CMTR is very widely available, so why wouldn't you ask for it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close