The LRV/URV numbers you calculate are very typical for dual remote seals with capillaries, assuming the transmitter's high side seal is connected at the bottom, and the low side seal is connected up top. In theory, reversing the connections so the high side seal is connected at the top and the low side seal is connected at the bottom, reversing the LRV and URV as suggested would produce the internal (high side minus low side) calculation you provided. I've always seen dual remote seals connected with the high side on the bottom, but I don't know why it wouldn't work as long as the transmitter is designed for it (Early Honeywell smart DP's would read when connected backwards but had significant error unless the transmitter was ordered with an option called 'compound characterization'. But this could be a wet leg (reference leg) installation and it's been so long since I've done a wet leg level calc that I'm drawing a blank at the moment.

Two considerations

- the output is 4-20mA, which has to be interpreted in some level or volume units by the receiver (DCS, controller, indicator). So it's really irrelevant whether the range is -236mbar to -91 mbar or 236mbar to 91 mbar if what the user/operator sees is mm, cm, m, l or bbls. If this new transmitter has a local indicator, then there's a reason for have level units that make senses.

- if the plant/mill uses a particular convention for connecting level-by-DP transmitters, as to whether the high side or the low side connects to the bottom of the tank, then it would seem prudent to continue with the convention in order to avoid longterm ownership issues with 'oddball' installations.

Thank you Drawn2 for your answer.

In fact, we still use wet leg and as you said the transmitter's high side is connected at the bottom and the low side seal is connected up top.

please find attached a file that describe my calculation, my methode to configure lrv and urv and the method of my collegues.

https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

I work in meters of water column or mmH2O because I find water column units intuitive when working with level.

Units aside, my calculation agrees with yours,
LRV = -2405 mmwc or -236 mBar
URV = -926.6 mmwc or -91 mBar

To create positive values for LRV and URV, the transmitter has to be connected 'backwards': low side at the bottom, high side at the top.

I find that doing so does not make it any more intuitive with LRV/empty/4.0mA/zero level = 236mbar and URV/full/20.0mA/100%level = 91mbar, where an increasing level has a diminishing pressure. But in the end, who reads pressure? Isn't the user value onverted to level or volume units in the HMI?

The signal 4-20 mA will be transmitted to the HMI and dispayed as % of level. So % of level eqquivalent to % of delta P.

Hello,

I found another example of zero and span as lrv and urv. (see link below)

• https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=bcfb61c1-2e41-4477-a35f-0

See attachment for the calc for reversed connections - positive values for LRV, URV
https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

thanks for the valuable information provided by @danw2

Transmitter Shop